From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266288AbUBERls (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:41:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265363AbUBERls (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:41:48 -0500 Received: from lgsx13.lg.ehu.es ([158.227.2.28]:32475 "EHLO lgsx13.lg.ehu.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266504AbUBERlP (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:41:15 -0500 Message-ID: <40228038.1070003@wanadoo.es> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 18:41:12 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Luis_Miguel_Garc=EDa?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031206 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: a.verweij@student.tudelft.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, akpm@digeo.com Subject: acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi: Since Andrew Morton picked up latest acpi bk updates, nforce motherboards have problems, mainly with ethernet adapters. Reporters say that with acpi=off, the problm gets fixed, so we think the problem could be acpi. Some more useful info: On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Luis Miguel García wrote: >> When I try to boot with latest mm series (such as actual rc3-mm1 or >> rc2-mm2), my nforce ethernet device doesn't works. It worked in the past >> with the forcedeth reverse engineered driver but now it keeps for 30 or >> more seconds halted (at boot) and then the network device dosn't run. >> >> Here is the dmesg of rc3-mm1. Do you want for me to test something? Thanks! >> >> P.S.: The ACPI related messages are larger that in rc3. > > My e100 on an nforce2 won't work in rc3-mm1. The "acpi=off" boot parameter makes it go. And for the record, I can boot with that kernel and save one dmesg for you if you want. Only send me a request and I'll send it to you. P.S.: Sent any messages you want directly to me as i'm not subscribed to acpi-devel. Thanks, Luis Miguel García >Which part of nforce support are you talking about luis? >On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Andrew Morton wrote: >> Luis Miguel Garc?a wrote: > > >>> > >>> > Andrew Morton wrote: >>> > >> >> >>>> > > >>> >>> >>>>> > >> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.2/2.6.2-mm1/ >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> - Merged some page reclaim fixes from Nick and Nikita. These yield some >>>>> > >> performance improvements in low memory and heavy paging situations. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> >>>> >>> > >>> > Andrew, do you know if this acpi pull down has nforce support fixed? >> >> >> >> It doesn't appear that way. >> > > >>> > Or perhaps it's even unnotified to the acpi team? >> >> >> >> I do not know. Sending them a bugzilla ID would help, if such a thing exists. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 >> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration >> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. >> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn >> _______________________________________________ >> Acpi-devel mailing list >> Acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel >> >> > >