From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <quic_manafm@quicinc.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drivers: thermal: clear all mitigation when thermal zone is disabled
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 07:25:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4024218b-7938-e181-f456-bff4b3fb157a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1643307093-22501-1-git-send-email-quic_manafm@quicinc.com>
Hi Manaf,
On 1/27/22 6:11 PM, Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi wrote:
> Whenever a thermal zone is in trip violated state, there is a chance
> that the same thermal zone mode can be disabled either via
> thermal core API or via thermal zone sysfs. Once it is disabled,
> the framework bails out any re-evaluation of thermal zone. It leads
> to a case where if it is already in mitigation state, it will stay
> the same state forever.
>
> To avoid above mentioned issue, add support to bind/unbind
> governor from thermal zone during thermal zone mode change request
> and clear all existing throttling in governor unbind_from_tz()
> callback.
I have one use case:
This would be a bit dangerous, e.g. to switch governors while there is a
high temperature. Although, sounds reasonable to left a 'default' state
for a next governor.
>
> Suggested-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <quic_manafm@quicinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c | 3 +++
> drivers/thermal/gov_step_wise.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Why only two governors need that change and not all?
Because they don't have 'bind/unbind' callbacks, then maybe we should
change that as well to make it consistent?
Regards,
Lukasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-31 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-27 18:11 Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi
2022-01-31 7:25 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2022-02-14 20:00 ` Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi
2022-02-15 9:57 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-02-16 18:51 ` Daniel Lezcano
2022-02-01 7:37 ` [drivers] 5c5cdc6f33: INFO:task_blocked_for_more_than#seconds kernel test robot
2022-02-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v5] drivers: thermal: clear all mitigation when thermal zone is disabled Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4024218b-7938-e181-f456-bff4b3fb157a@arm.com \
--to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=amitk@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_manafm@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®