mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kurt@linutronix.de>, <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS"
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:XDP (eXpress Data Path)" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next v3 2/2] igc: Link queues to NAPI instances
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 13:53:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40242f59-139a-4b45-8949-1210039f881b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxgK5jsCn5VmKKrH@LQ3V64L9R2>



On 10/22/2024 1:28 PM, Joe Damato wrote:
> I took another look at this to make sure that RTNL is held when
> igc_set_queue_napi is called after the e1000 bug report came in [1],
> and there may be two locations I've missed:
> 
> 1. igc_resume, which calls __igc_open
> 2. igc_io_error_detected, which calls igc_down
> 
> In both cases, I think the code can be modified to hold rtnl around
> calls to __igc_open and igc_down.
> 
> Let me know what you think ?
> 
> If you agree that I should hold rtnl in both of those cases, what is
> the best way to proceed:
>   - send a v4, or
>   - wait for this to get merged (since I got the notification it was
>     pulled into intel-next) and send a fixes ?
> 

Intel-next uses a stacked set of patches which we then send in batches
via PRs as they pass our internal testing.

We can drop the v3 and await v4.

> Here's the full analysis I came up with; I tried to be thorough, but
> it is certainly possible I missed a call site:
> 
> For the up case:
> 
> - igc_up:
>   - called from igc_reinit_locked, which is called via:
>     - igc_reset_task (rtnl is held)
>     - igc_set_features (ndo_set_features, which itself has an ASSERT_RTNL)
>     - various places in igc_ethtool (set_priv_flags, nway_reset,
>       ethtool_set_eee) all of which have RTNL held
>   - igc_change_mtu which also has RTNL held
> - __igc_open
>   - called from igc_resume, which may need an rtnl_lock ?
>   - igc_open
>     - called from igc_io_resume, rtnl is held
>     - called from igc_reinit_queues, only via ethool set_channels,
>       where rtnl is held
>     - ndo_open where rtnl is held
> 
> For the down case:
> 
> - igc_down:
>   - called from various ethtool locations (set_ringparam,
>     set_pauseparam, set_link_ksettings) all of which hold rtnl
>   - called from igc_io_error_detected, which may need an rtnl_lock
>   - igc_reinit_locked which is fine, as described above
>   - igc_change_mtu which is fine, as described above
>   - called from __igc_close
>     - called from __igc_shutdown which holds rtnl
>     - called from igc_reinit_queues which is fine as described above
>     - called from igc_close which is ndo_close

This analysis looks complete to me.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-22 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-18 17:13 [net-next v3 0/2] igc: Link IRQs and queues to NAPIs Joe Damato
2024-10-18 17:13 ` [net-next v3 1/2] igc: Link IRQs to NAPI instances Joe Damato
2024-10-21 17:48   ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2024-10-22 18:50   ` Jacob Keller
2024-10-22 19:54     ` Joe Damato
2024-10-18 17:13 ` [net-next v3 2/2] igc: Link queues " Joe Damato
2024-10-21 17:48   ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2024-10-22 20:28   ` Joe Damato
2024-10-22 20:53     ` Jacob Keller [this message]
2024-10-22 20:58       ` Joe Damato

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40242f59-139a-4b45-8949-1210039f881b@intel.com \
    --to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®