From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<kurt@linutronix.de>, <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:XDP (eXpress Data Path)" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next v3 2/2] igc: Link queues to NAPI instances
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 13:53:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40242f59-139a-4b45-8949-1210039f881b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxgK5jsCn5VmKKrH@LQ3V64L9R2>
On 10/22/2024 1:28 PM, Joe Damato wrote:
> I took another look at this to make sure that RTNL is held when
> igc_set_queue_napi is called after the e1000 bug report came in [1],
> and there may be two locations I've missed:
>
> 1. igc_resume, which calls __igc_open
> 2. igc_io_error_detected, which calls igc_down
>
> In both cases, I think the code can be modified to hold rtnl around
> calls to __igc_open and igc_down.
>
> Let me know what you think ?
>
> If you agree that I should hold rtnl in both of those cases, what is
> the best way to proceed:
> - send a v4, or
> - wait for this to get merged (since I got the notification it was
> pulled into intel-next) and send a fixes ?
>
Intel-next uses a stacked set of patches which we then send in batches
via PRs as they pass our internal testing.
We can drop the v3 and await v4.
> Here's the full analysis I came up with; I tried to be thorough, but
> it is certainly possible I missed a call site:
>
> For the up case:
>
> - igc_up:
> - called from igc_reinit_locked, which is called via:
> - igc_reset_task (rtnl is held)
> - igc_set_features (ndo_set_features, which itself has an ASSERT_RTNL)
> - various places in igc_ethtool (set_priv_flags, nway_reset,
> ethtool_set_eee) all of which have RTNL held
> - igc_change_mtu which also has RTNL held
> - __igc_open
> - called from igc_resume, which may need an rtnl_lock ?
> - igc_open
> - called from igc_io_resume, rtnl is held
> - called from igc_reinit_queues, only via ethool set_channels,
> where rtnl is held
> - ndo_open where rtnl is held
>
> For the down case:
>
> - igc_down:
> - called from various ethtool locations (set_ringparam,
> set_pauseparam, set_link_ksettings) all of which hold rtnl
> - called from igc_io_error_detected, which may need an rtnl_lock
> - igc_reinit_locked which is fine, as described above
> - igc_change_mtu which is fine, as described above
> - called from __igc_close
> - called from __igc_shutdown which holds rtnl
> - called from igc_reinit_queues which is fine as described above
> - called from igc_close which is ndo_close
This analysis looks complete to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-22 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-18 17:13 [net-next v3 0/2] igc: Link IRQs and queues to NAPIs Joe Damato
2024-10-18 17:13 ` [net-next v3 1/2] igc: Link IRQs to NAPI instances Joe Damato
2024-10-21 17:48 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2024-10-22 18:50 ` Jacob Keller
2024-10-22 19:54 ` Joe Damato
2024-10-18 17:13 ` [net-next v3 2/2] igc: Link queues " Joe Damato
2024-10-21 17:48 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2024-10-22 20:28 ` Joe Damato
2024-10-22 20:53 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
2024-10-22 20:58 ` Joe Damato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40242f59-139a-4b45-8949-1210039f881b@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®