From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756843Ab2CVThJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:37:09 -0400 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:53199 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753162Ab2CVThG (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:37:06 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.4-dev To: lwoodman@redhat.com Cc: Christoph Lameter , KOSAKI Motohiro , linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel , Motohiro Kosaki Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] do_migrate_pages() calls migrate_to_node() even if task is already on a correct node In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:07:00 -0400." <4F6B7854.1040203@redhat.com> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <4F6B6BFF.1020701@redhat.com> <4F6B7358.60800@gmail.com> <4F6B7854.1040203@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1332445016_39840P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:36:56 -0400 Message-ID: <40300.1332445016@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=steiner.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020201.4F6B7F59.012F,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2011-07-25 19:15:43, dmn=2011-05-27 18:58:46, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1332445016_39840P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:07:00 -0400, Larry Woodman said: > So to be clear on this, in that case the intention would be move 3 to 4, > 4 to 5 and 5 to 6 > to keep the node ordering the same? Would it make more sense to do 5->6, 4->5, 3->4? If we move stuff from 3 to 4 before clearing the old 4 stuff out, it might get crowded? --==_Exmh_1332445016_39840P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQIVAwUBT2t/VwdmEQWDXROgAQIkgg//WSjenDA84KouiK00Bf7PdzfwvRLox3kL 3IN/CMMaPLbOIjjO1Uy8NpCJAgNRTrR40mpzAY3zLs3y7Ir6bYb9W2UtG72Xu/Io XdsTkXQQ4BQvBsOe21YSqKVORtziXLw9LhlDpfJRPog+ocDjIrlK5twCG4VpSisf Vl1RwbEkRMFlEJSHCbzwbzlaMNgG9CAdBxD+hnFsAgTgk+bXW37zEhw+v07tWtVU Foy1Cpa/QhHyxuuQ9MvMALu8jO8g4fzhUB10JRbLUa7e3AKZ9G/Sp0pBGIDpgMkd 40HNg0Xf3Yv0PBRBtAjQSojiu+iFwohsA3ian1aPHZVR7Zp8pFi3RC1QVZcpI+lq 3WAi5zvM9oeVnKxUTy1ya1w9cG8vf8XFgI1WOomtVfDIc0Ndd6yCvWU7DfLknkTb pDN1DdH0MtGZtym64C4DbRdp4Vy9cjcYOD9OcFN1+ZGx/pD3ggzUw9bPZcH5/AFh Hqlhrr+7bf+fTsdoIqspVXhs+NlrRQegQTyJjivOitTKcehrG6WcQYta8q51uLF7 Jl6ms8dlPJWrLiXZSCSdfEMxf0AQj/yoyzSB7rtixPQyOPLrKGs6nkZhpjmjdO/D v3edqqnCHcoVyEtJS83UN3A6qU5a0qg5pM3npB2gHjP4uQp6HChWBIz+rMV/gCy0 lDzYDAe23OE= =xLes -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1332445016_39840P--