From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267828AbUBRSvd (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:51:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267829AbUBRSvd (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:51:33 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.85]:36584 "EHLO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267828AbUBRStx (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:49:53 -0500 Message-ID: <4033B3CC.2030609@namesys.com> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:49:48 -0800 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: martin f krafft CC: linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: the crux with DMA References: <20040218112052.GA8001@diamond.madduck.net> In-Reply-To: <20040218112052.GA8001@diamond.madduck.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.3.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org martin f krafft wrote: >. > >I know that neither, reiserfs nor ext3, are high-performance, > both ext3 and reiserfs are higher performance than XFS for typical file sizes. XFS does very well for streaming video though (as does reiser4).