From: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
To: RANDAZZO@ddc-web.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2 nics in the same machine...
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:16:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <405ABA74.5030409@aitel.hist.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89760D3F308BD41183B000508BAFAC4104B17010@DDCNYNTD>
RANDAZZO@ddc-web.com wrote:
> I have connected two nics in the same machine with a null modem cable...
>
> I have configured nic 1 to be 156.15.16.1 and nic 2 to be 156.15.16.2
>
> I have adjusted the routes so that nic 1 routes to nic 2 and vice versa...
>
> how come when I ping 156.15.16.1 it does not go out nic 2...
>
> am I missing something?
Kernel sees that it have a ping packet destined for 156.15.16.1
Kernel notices it has several NICs available, so it chooses
the one closest to the destination. NIC1 _is_ 156.15.16.1 so it
_is_ the destination.
Kernel figures that the packet is already here, and never sends it
out on the wire.
A crossed cable between two NICS in the same machine is
a testing setup, right?
If you want to test NICs (or cables & hubs) do this:
1. Run a packet sniffer on the "listening" NIC. Run it in
promiscuous mode so it'll even sniff packets not meant for it.
2. Set a default route to the "sending" NIC. Or at least a route
to some network that isn't on your machine.
3. Ping the remote network. You will not get an answer, but:
The packet will be sent through the "sending" NIC,
and sniffed by the "listening" NIC. So you'll verify that
NICs and cable works. Optionally make a script that reverses
the roles of the two NICs if you want to test both ways.
If, on the other hand, you're testing apps/protocols, don't worry that
the traffic don't hit the wire. A test utilizing internal loopback
is just as good. If you really need traffic to go out on a wire, then
you likely need two or more machines for a realistic test too.
Helge Hafting
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-19 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-18 20:20 RANDAZZO
2004-03-18 21:54 ` Robin Rosenberg
2004-03-19 9:16 ` Helge Hafting [this message]
2004-03-19 22:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-03-20 18:42 ` Helge Hafting
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=405ABA74.5030409@aitel.hist.no \
--to=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=RANDAZZO@ddc-web.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome