mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	paul@paul-moore.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jmorris@namei.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
	stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/11] LSM: syscalls for current process attributes
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 12:51:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <405ff748-dea0-794b-fa58-18b0a4703587@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230222200838.8149-5-casey@schaufler-ca.com>


On 22/02/2023 21:08, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Create a system call lsm_get_self_attr() to provide the security
> module maintained attributes of the current process.
> Create a system call lsm_set_self_attr() to set a security
> module maintained attribute of the current process.
> Historically these attributes have been exposed to user space via
> entries in procfs under /proc/self/attr.
> 
> The attribute value is provided in a lsm_ctx structure. The structure
> identifys the size of the attribute, and the attribute value. The format
> of the attribute value is defined by the security module. A flags field
> is included for LSM specific information. It is currently unused and must
> be 0. The total size of the data, including the lsm_ctx structure and any
> padding, is maintained as well.
> 
> struct lsm_ctx {
>          __u64   id;
>          __u64   flags;
>          __u64   len;
>          __u64   ctx_len;
>          __u8    ctx[];
> };
> 
> Two new LSM hooks are used to interface with the LSMs.
> security_getselfattr() collects the lsm_ctx values from the
> LSMs that support the hook, accounting for space requirements.
> security_setselfattr() identifies which LSM the attribute is
> intended for and passes it along.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/userspace-api/lsm.rst |  15 ++++
>   include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h       |   4 ++
>   include/linux/lsm_hooks.h           |   9 +++
>   include/linux/security.h            |  19 +++++
>   include/linux/syscalls.h            |   4 ++
>   include/uapi/linux/lsm.h            |  33 +++++++++
>   kernel/sys_ni.c                     |   4 ++
>   security/Makefile                   |   1 +
>   security/lsm_syscalls.c             | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   security/security.c                 |  82 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   10 files changed, 275 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 security/lsm_syscalls.c
> 

[...]

> +/**
> + * security_setselfattr - Set an LSM attribute on the current process.
> + * @attr: which attribute to return
> + * @ctx: the user-space source for the information
> + * @size: the size of the data
> + *
> + * Set an LSM attribute for the current process. The LSM, attribute
> + * and new value are included in @ctx.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on seccess, an LSM specific value on failure.
> + */
> +int security_setselfattr(u64 __user attr, struct lsm_ctx __user *ctx,
> +			 size_t __user size)
> +{
> +	struct security_hook_list *hp;
> +	struct lsm_ctx lctx;
> +
> +	if (size < sizeof(*ctx))

If the lsm_ctx struct could grow in the future, we should check the size 
of the struct to the last field for compatibility reasons, see 
Landlock's copy_min_struct_from_user().


> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (copy_from_user(&lctx, ctx, sizeof(*ctx)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.setselfattr, list)
> +		if ((hp->lsmid->id) == lctx.id)
> +			return hp->hook.setselfattr(attr, ctx, size);
> +
> +	return LSM_RET_DEFAULT(setselfattr);
> +}
> +
>   int security_getprocattr(struct task_struct *p, int lsmid, const char *name,
>   			 char **value)
>   {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-07 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230222200838.8149-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2023-02-22 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] LSM: Three basic syscalls Casey Schaufler
2023-02-22 20:08   ` [PATCH v6 01/11] LSM: Identify modules by more than name Casey Schaufler
2023-02-22 20:08   ` [PATCH v6 02/11] LSM: Maintain a table of LSM attribute data Casey Schaufler
2023-02-25 13:37     ` kernel test robot
2023-02-22 20:08   ` [PATCH v6 03/11] proc: Use lsmids instead of lsm names for attrs Casey Schaufler
2023-02-22 20:08   ` [PATCH v6 04/11] LSM: syscalls for current process attributes Casey Schaufler
2023-02-23  4:57     ` kernel test robot
2023-02-23  8:32     ` kernel test robot
2023-02-23 12:49     ` kernel test robot
2023-03-03 18:41     ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-03-07 11:51     ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2023-03-09  2:30       ` Casey Schaufler
2023-03-14 22:00         ` Paul Moore
2023-03-07 11:56     ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-03-07 17:04       ` Casey Schaufler
2023-03-07 17:13       ` Casey Schaufler
2023-03-07 14:57     ` Florian Weimer
2023-02-22 20:08   ` [PATCH v6 05/11] LSM: Create lsm_module_list system call Casey Schaufler
2023-03-03 18:32     ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-03-07 11:33     ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-06 16:31       ` Casey Schaufler
2023-02-22 20:08   ` [PATCH v6 06/11] LSM: wireup Linux Security Module syscalls Casey Schaufler
2023-02-23 10:19     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-03-03 18:34     ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-22 20:08   ` [PATCH v6 07/11] LSM: Helpers for attribute names and filling an lsm_ctx Casey Schaufler
2023-02-22 20:08   ` [PATCH v6 08/11] Smack: implement setselfattr and getselfattr hooks Casey Schaufler
2023-02-22 20:08   ` [PATCH v6 09/11] AppArmor: Add selfattr hooks Casey Schaufler
2023-02-22 20:08   ` [PATCH v6 10/11] SELinux: " Casey Schaufler
2023-02-22 20:08   ` [PATCH v6 11/11] LSM: selftests for Linux Security Module syscalls Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=405ff748-dea0-794b-fa58-18b0a4703587@digikod.net \
    --to=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®