From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org,
dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: v4.7-rc2 build: 0 failures 5 warnings (v4.7-rc2)
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 11:44:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4062856.1Bu0ArSlWE@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1b9j2R-0002zq-R2@optimist>
On Monday, June 6, 2016 2:09:07 AM CEST Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
> arm-allmodconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches
>
> Warnings:
> ../drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c:1170:6: warning: unused variable 'r' [-Wunused-variable]
> ../drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/hdmi5.c:123:6: warning: unused variable 'r' [-Wunused-variable]
These got introduced by Fixes: 973999aa0140 ("drm/omap: Remove
regulator API abuse") in 4.7-rc2, and are trivial to fix, I can provide a
patch if needed.
I also have a couple of other regression fixes in my local tree
that I hope to see in 4.7, but with DRM I never know when to resend
them, as they sometimes do not show up in linux-next before they get
merged into mainline.
This is my current backlog:
d703eb3c7606 [IN NEXT] drm: sun4i: fix probe error handling
ee0d3dafedb7 [IN NEXT] drm: sun4i: print DMA address correctly
4b51817edcd0 [IN NEXT] drm/sun4i: add COMMON_CLK dependency
04197e0d8201 [SUBMITTED 20160516] drm: exynos: mark pm functions as __maybe_unused
1aa3f513d264 [SUBMITTED 20160516] drm: mediatek: add CONFIG_OF dependency
dee4d1c31214 [SUBMITTED 20160511] drm: mediatek: remove IOMMU_DMA select
845cd86005ea [SUBMITTED 20160511] drm/omap: include linux/of.h where needed
d657e5dd56c5 [SUBMITTED 20160511] drm: mediatek: add COMMON_CLK dependency
539c2a57be6f [SUBMITTED x2 20160225] drm: avoid uninitialized timestamp use in wait_vblank
921b0acae44c [SUBMITTED 2015012drm: armada: use dma_addr_t properly
Am I right to assume that as the first eight that are all regressions against
4.6 will show up in 4.7 without me doing anything further, but that I should
resend the last two so they can make it into 4.8, and get backported if
necessary?
Arnd
_______________________________________________
Kernel-build-reports mailing list
Kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-build-reports
next parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-06 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1b9j2R-0002zq-R2@optimist>
2016-06-06 9:44 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-06-06 10:08 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-06-06 10:13 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2016-06-06 10:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4062856.1Bu0ArSlWE@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®