From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262608AbUC2EQM (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:16:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262609AbUC2EQM (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:16:12 -0500 Received: from mxsf24.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.224]:6416 "EHLO mxsf24.cluster1.charter.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262608AbUC2EQJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:16:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4067A2CA.9020300@charter.net> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:15:06 -0500 From: "Timothy C. McGrath" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: I'm curious about the stability of software RAID 5 and ext3 in 2.6.x X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am currently using Linux kernel 2.4.25 with software raid 5 and ext3. I've noticed recently some people noting corruption with raid 5 and ext3 in the 2.6 kernel tree on the Linux kernel mailing list. I'd like to know if upgrading to the 2.6 tree would be safe for me at this time (have these problems been fixed?) or if that's questionable, who I should ask for more information on the situation. Sorry for bothering you, Timothy C. McGrath -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAZ6LK4pPTiiJCEYkRAr6QAKCoYZqQ9mPi9qNT4EK/ssIYsrycbQCcCp0A oanNpyvyujcOfbAwxOIIVLw= =Jfmk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----