Re: [PATCH v5 04/10] IMA: Updated IMA policy functions to return keyrings option read from the policy

[Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>]

On 11/12/2019 9:05 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:

>>   int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid,
>>   		     enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr,
>> -		     struct ima_template_desc **template_desc)
>> +		     struct ima_template_desc **template_desc,
>> +		     char **keyrings)
>>   {
>>   	struct ima_rule_entry *entry;
>>   	int action = 0, actmask = flags | (flags << 1);
>> @@ -527,6 +529,9 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid,
>>   		if ((pcr) && (entry->flags & IMA_PCR))
>>   			*pcr = entry->pcr;
>>   
>> +		if ((keyrings) && (entry->flags & IMA_KEYRINGS))
>> +			*keyrings = entry->keyrings;
> 
> ima_match_rules() determines whether the rule is in policy or not. It
> returns true on rule match, false on failure.  There's no need to
> return the list of keyrings.

But the above code change is in ima_match_policy() - not in 
ima_match_rules() function.

ima_match_rules() function is updated in Patch #1 -
[PATCH v5 01/10] IMA: Added KEYRING_CHECK func in IMA policy to measure keys

I've updated that function to check if func is "KEYRING_CHECK" and 
return true\false as appropriate.

Am I missing something?

  -lakshmi