Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Initialize wq_isolated_cpumask in workqueue_init_early()

[Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>]

On 6/17/25 12:42 AM, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
> Now when isolcpus is enabled via the cmdline, wq_isolated_cpumask does
> not include these isolated CPUs, even wq_unbound_cpumask has already
> excluded them. It is only when we successfully configure an isolate cpuset
> partition that wq_isolated_cpumask gets overwritten by
> workqueue_unbound_exclude_cpumask(), including both the cmdline-specified
> isolated CPUs and the isolated CPUs within the cpuset partitions.
>
> Fix this issue by initializing wq_isolated_cpumask properly in
> workqueue_init_early().
>
> Fixes: fe28f631fa94 ("workqueue: Add workqueue_unbound_exclude_cpumask() to exclude CPUs from wq_unbound_cpumask")
> Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
> ---
>   kernel/workqueue.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 97f37b5bae669..9f91480758288 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -7767,7 +7767,8 @@ void __init workqueue_init_early(void)
>   		restrict_unbound_cpumask("workqueue.unbound_cpus", &wq_cmdline_cpumask);
>   
>   	cpumask_copy(wq_requested_unbound_cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask);
> -
> +	cpumask_andnot(wq_isolated_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask,
> +						housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN));
>   	pwq_cache = KMEM_CACHE(pool_workqueue, SLAB_PANIC);
>   
>   	unbound_wq_update_pwq_attrs_buf = alloc_workqueue_attrs();

Right, the wq_isolated_cpumask isn't initialized properly. Thank for 
fixing that.

Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>