From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755770AbbAZOlX (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:41:23 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:56931 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753808AbbAZOlW (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:41:22 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "Li, Aubrey" , Peter Zijlstra , "Brown, Len" , "alan@linux.intel.com" , LKML , Linux PM list Subject: Re: [PATCH v3]PM/Sleep: Timer quiesce in freeze state Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:04:05 +0100 Message-ID: <4090311.nIPlPBbS65@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <54866625.8010406@linux.intel.com> <2076277.JWdUtd56Il@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, January 26, 2015 03:34:22 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, January 26, 2015 03:24:27 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Monday, January 26, 2015 10:40:24 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > The only remaining issue might be a NMI calling into > > > > > ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() before timekeeping is resumed. Its probably a > > > > > non issue on x86/tsc, but it might be a problem on other platforms > > > > > which turn off devices, clocks, It's not rocket science to prevent > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > I don't see any users of ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() at all, unless some non-trivial > > > > macros are involved. At least grepping for it only returns the definition, > > > > declarations and the line in trace.c. > > > > > > You can trace in NMI and perf is going to use ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() > > > eventually as well. > > > > So I'm not sure how to intercept that to be honest. Any hints? > > If we suspend timekeeping we can make the fast timekeeper point at a > dummy readout function which returns the time at suspend, if the clock > source does not resume automagically. > > As I said TSC should be a non issue, but other stuff might be. We > could make it conditional on CLOCK_SOURCE_SUSPEND_NONSTOP perhaps. OK, thanks! Rafael