From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S262330AbVF1X6u@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262330AbVF1X6u (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:58:50 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262297AbVF1XoV
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:44:21 -0400
Received: from smtpout.mac.com ([17.250.248.70]:32737 "EHLO smtpout.mac.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261232AbVF1XZc (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:25:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4846.10.10.10.24.1119999568.squirrel@linux1>
References: <42B9E536.60704@pobox.com> <20050623235634.GC14426@waste.org> <20050624064101.GB14292@pasky.ji.cz> <20050624123819.GD9519@64m.dyndns.org> <20050628150027.GB1275@pasky.ji.cz> <20050628180157.GI12006@waste.org> <62CF578B-B9DF-4DEA-8BAD-041F357771FD@mac.com> <3886.10.10.10.24.1119991512.squirrel@linux1> <20050628221422.GT12006@waste.org> <3993.10.10.10.24.1119997389.squirrel@linux1> <20050628224946.GU12006@waste.org> <4846.10.10.10.24.1119999568.squirrel@linux1>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <40A9C7C2-1AFE-45BC-90A5-571628304479@mac.com>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>,
       Christopher Li <hg@chrisli.org>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
       Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>, mercurial@selenic.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>
Subject: Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:25:24 -0400
To: Sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Jun 28, 2005, at 18:59:28, Sean wrote:
> By the sounds of it, git could just use Mecurial or some variation  
> thereof
> as a back end.

Umm, you seem to miss the point, sir.  If you use Mercurial, there is no
reason you should layer any part of Git on top of it.  It already does
everything that git does anyways.

> Git is already so much better for the things I do than BK ever was,  
> I'll
> stick with it.

This is like saying "Windows 3.1 is already so much better for the  
things
I do than DOS ever was, I'll stick with it."  :-D

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a18 C++++>$ UB/L/X/*++++(+)>$ P+++(++++)>$
L++++(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+
PGP+++ t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b++++(++) DI+ D+ G e->++++$ h!*()>++$  
r  !y?(-)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------