From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only obsolete roots if a root shadow page is zapped
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:55:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40a22c39-9da4-6c37-8ad0-b33970e35a2b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220225182248.3812651-5-seanjc@google.com>
On 2/25/22 19:22, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> @@ -5656,7 +5707,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(struct kvm *kvm)
> * Note: we need to do this under the protection of mmu_lock,
> * otherwise, vcpu would purge shadow page but miss tlb flush.
> */
> - kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_MMU_RELOAD);
> + kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_MMU_FREE_OBSOLETE_ROOTS);
>
I was going to squash in this:
* invalidating TDP MMU roots must be done while holding mmu_lock for
- * write and in the same critical section as making the reload request,
+ * write and in the same critical section as making the free request,
* e.g. before kvm_zap_obsolete_pages() could drop mmu_lock and yield.
But then I realized that this needs better comments and that my knowledge of
this has serious holes. Regarding this comment, this is my proposal:
/*
* Invalidated TDP MMU roots are zapped within MMU read_lock to be
* able to walk the list of roots, but with the expectation of no
* concurrent change to the pages themselves. There cannot be
* any yield between kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots and the free
* request, otherwise somebody could grab a reference to the root
* and break that assumption.
*/
if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm))
kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(kvm);
However, for the second comment (the one in the context above), there's much
more. From easier to harder:
1) I'm basically clueless about the TLB flush "note" above.
2) It's not clear to me what needs to use for_each_tdp_mmu_root; for
example, why would anything but the MMU notifiers use for_each_tdp_mmu_root?
It is used in kvm_tdp_mmu_write_protect_gfn, kvm_tdp_mmu_try_split_huge_pages
and kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_pt_masked.
3) Does it make sense that yielding users of for_each_tdp_mmu_root must
either look at valid roots only, or take MMU lock for write? If so, can
this be enforced in tdp_mmu_next_root?
4) If the previous point is correct, _who_ could grab a reference and
not release it before kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots runs? That is,
is "somebody could grab a reference" an accurate explanation in the first
comment above?
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-01 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-25 18:22 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only obsolete roots on "reload" Sean Christopherson
2022-02-25 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: x86: Remove spurious whitespaces from kvm_post_set_cr4() Sean Christopherson
2022-02-25 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: x86: Invoke kvm_mmu_unload() directly on CR4.PCIDE change Sean Christopherson
2022-02-25 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: Drop kvm_reload_remote_mmus(), open code request in x86 users Sean Christopherson
2022-02-28 22:05 ` Ben Gardon
2022-02-25 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only obsolete roots if a root shadow page is zapped Sean Christopherson
2022-02-28 22:38 ` Ben Gardon
2022-03-01 17:55 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-03-02 18:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-02 19:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-02 20:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-02 22:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 7:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 23:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-25 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: s390: Replace KVM_REQ_MMU_RELOAD usage with arch specific request Sean Christopherson
2022-02-25 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: Drop KVM_REQ_MMU_RELOAD and update vcpu-requests.rst documentation Sean Christopherson
2022-02-28 22:22 ` Ben Gardon
2022-02-25 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: WARN if is_unsync_root() is called on a root without a shadow page Sean Christopherson
2022-02-28 22:33 ` Ben Gardon
2022-03-01 15:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-01 17:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only obsolete roots on "reload" Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40a22c39-9da4-6c37-8ad0-b33970e35a2b@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®