Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: dwc2: Add bindings for new Ingenic SoCs.

[Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>]

Hi,

On 2022/4/14 下午6:00, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>
>> Am 14.04.2022 um 09:32 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>:
>>
>> On 13/04/2022 21:30, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> So we need "snps,dwc2" to get any driver match and I thought the "ingenic,jz4780-otg" is redundant.
>>>
>>> But maintainers convinced me to keep it as a dummy compatible in the .dtsi for potential future
>>> specialization (which does not exist and seems not to be necessary).
>> Isn't exactly the next patch 2/2 using such specialization?
>>
>>> Unless I can convince them
>>> that this is never ever needed. Which is beyond my knowledge and almost everyone.
>>>
>>> So we can't remove the "snps,dwc2" here.
>>>
>>> Well, we can with more work elsewhere.
>>> You have to extend the dwc2_of_match_table to include all ingenic devices.
>>>
>>> Therefore we now know 3 potential solutions:
>>> a) remove "ingenic,jz4780-otg" from jz4780.dtsi (my proposal)
>>> b) add "ingenic,jz4780-otg" to dwc2.yaml together with "snps,dwc2" (your proposal + my suggestion here)
>>> c) add only "ingenic,jz4780-otg" to dwc2.yaml and extend the match table in drivers//usb/dwc2/params.c (new proposals)
>>>
>>>  From consistency point of view I think variant b) is the right one. a) was rejected and c) only adds redundant code.
>> c) was already proposed by Zhou, so if you think the code is not correct
>> (the params for jz4780) maybe nack it there, so we will know that driver
>> needs fixes.
> Ah, ok. Now I see. I was just focussed on this patch and related dtbscheck
> messages and did not read patch 2/2.
>
> Yes, looking at both, they are variant c). Sorry that I didn't see it earlier.

It looks like we need a [3/3] to remove "snps,dwc2", which not only solves
the dtbscheck complaining problem, but also doesn't affect normal use after
removing "snps,dwc2".


>
> As said: I am open to anything as long as the dtbscheck doesn't complain any more.
>
> BR and sorry for the confusion,
> Nikolaus