From: Nam Cao <namcaov@gmail.com>
To: forest@alittletooquiet.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: namcaov@gmail.com, philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/5] staging: vt6655: change device_alloc_rx_buf's argument
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 22:29:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40d72f6fdc3394a0bba15753d4f3b103bbc8332e.1663273218.git.namcaov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1663273218.git.namcaov@gmail.com>
The function device_alloc_rx_buf takes struct vnt_rx_desc as 1 argument,
but only accesses the member rd_info of this struct. Change this
argument to struct vnt_rd_info instead.
This is preparation to implement correct out-of-memory error handling.
Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcaov@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
index 27fe28156257..ca6c4266f010 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static int device_init_td1_ring(struct vnt_private *priv);
static int device_rx_srv(struct vnt_private *priv, unsigned int idx);
static int device_tx_srv(struct vnt_private *priv, unsigned int idx);
-static bool device_alloc_rx_buf(struct vnt_private *, struct vnt_rx_desc *);
+static bool device_alloc_rx_buf(struct vnt_private *, struct vnt_rd_info *);
static void device_init_rx_desc(struct vnt_private *priv, struct vnt_rx_desc *rd);
static void device_free_rx_buf(struct vnt_private *priv,
struct vnt_rx_desc *rd);
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int device_init_rd0_ring(struct vnt_private *priv)
goto err_free_desc;
}
- if (!device_alloc_rx_buf(priv, desc)) {
+ if (!device_alloc_rx_buf(priv, desc->rd_info)) {
dev_err(&priv->pcid->dev, "can not alloc rx bufs\n");
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err_free_rd;
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ static int device_init_rd1_ring(struct vnt_private *priv)
goto err_free_desc;
}
- if (!device_alloc_rx_buf(priv, desc)) {
+ if (!device_alloc_rx_buf(priv, desc->rd_info)) {
dev_err(&priv->pcid->dev, "can not alloc rx bufs\n");
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err_free_rd;
@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static int device_rx_srv(struct vnt_private *priv, unsigned int idx)
vnt_receive_frame(priv, rd);
- if (!device_alloc_rx_buf(priv, rd)) {
+ if (!device_alloc_rx_buf(priv, rd->rd_info)) {
dev_err(&priv->pcid->dev,
"can not allocate rx buf\n");
break;
@@ -856,10 +856,8 @@ static int device_rx_srv(struct vnt_private *priv, unsigned int idx)
}
static bool device_alloc_rx_buf(struct vnt_private *priv,
- struct vnt_rx_desc *rd)
+ struct vnt_rd_info *rd_info)
{
- struct vnt_rd_info *rd_info = rd->rd_info;
-
rd_info->skb = dev_alloc_skb((int)priv->rx_buf_sz);
if (!rd_info->skb)
return false;
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-15 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-15 20:29 [RFC PATCH 0/5] staging: vt6655: Implement allocation failure handling Nam Cao
2022-09-15 20:29 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] staging: vt6655: remove redundant if condition Nam Cao
2022-09-15 20:29 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] staging: vt6655: change vnt_receive_frame return type to void Nam Cao
2022-09-19 9:45 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-09-27 11:36 ` Nam Cao
2022-09-15 20:29 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] staging: vt6655: split device_alloc_rx_buf Nam Cao
2022-09-19 9:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-09-27 11:39 ` Nam Cao
2022-09-15 20:29 ` Nam Cao [this message]
2022-09-15 20:29 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] staging: vt6655: implement allocation failure handling Nam Cao
2022-09-19 10:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-09-27 11:54 ` Nam Cao
2022-09-15 20:58 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] staging: vt6655: Implement " Philipp Hortmann
2022-09-16 7:11 ` Nam Cao
2022-09-16 7:38 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-09-19 9:36 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40d72f6fdc3394a0bba15753d4f3b103bbc8332e.1663273218.git.namcaov@gmail.com \
--to=namcaov@gmail.com \
--cc=forest@alittletooquiet.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome