From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F7803C2B8F; Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=94.136.29.106 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791750834; cv=none; b=AahvpHtQ4XHxXAGdWM5EluAX9JPKKnDELKpOuQUAfh/G1drz13EP9EJcaYHSXuonQyqQRanxXwsbci05Xx5AoOufxkp8jK3LiJbHwJcQ2nUjeXnCeKc2J+VxFzPybbPMPp/C2d0SiyGf9SmJs+/9XMsUK30GbOUjGSmOK+WtQIk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791750834; c=relaxed/simple; bh=g4UWbUinchomSLFSYVuzUtSeD0BgU42CnUiWXIZ2ddc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=g7tC00ivzWk8/RJxmwJNAYJS9lXGDdx/l9hSNUsOzlnsKry1bRlisLMcB9+w/jsVfmaDw7RKwSm1DBbbAdZ5qRttRXhbNxg8VPSKfBjY/XgwgBWhNIXMq1bpjRGgJbDmc53L6iuJQeLqgBT1Y1giRmynbUK7C6xoxIWU57q57pE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=proxmox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proxmox.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=94.136.29.106 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=proxmox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proxmox.com Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D1BB547FED; Sun, 11 Oct 2026 22:33:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40e4d425-8239-4375-ad96-adeff63e0f8d@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:33:37 +1100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 7.2.4: nfsd sends CB_OFFLOAD with all-zero stateid, async NFSv4.2 COPY never completes To: Greg KH Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, Chuck Lever , Jeff Layton , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <7cc824c4-632d-49df-ae5e-cfcbb5bf76ad@proxmox.com> <2026101121-staining-scheme-358a@gregkh> Content-Language: en-US From: Lubos Rendek In-Reply-To: <2026101121-staining-scheme-358a@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1791750823244 On Sun, Oct 11, 2026 at 09:19 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > Can you just use git bisect to determine the offending commit? > > And is this also the same for 7.3-rc? 7.3-rc6 works fine here, only 7.2.y and 6.18.y are affected. I didn't bisect, but Jeff confirmed 14b978e8d05c as the culprit and Sasha has queued the fix, so I think a bisect isn't needed anymore. Let me know if you still want one. Thanks everyone for the quick response. Lubos