From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265226AbUG0MdJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:33:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265215AbUG0MdI (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:33:08 -0400 Received: from mail.tv-sign.ru ([213.234.233.51]:140 "EHLO several.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265226AbUG0M3l (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:29:41 -0400 Message-ID: <41064BB8.4F8B7543@tv-sign.ru> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:34:00 +0400 From: Oleg Nesterov X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rajesh Venkatasubramanian Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] prio_tree iterator cleanup. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Rajesh, Rajesh Venkatasubramanian wrote: > > If you can post your 2nd and 3rd patches independent of your > first patch, that will be great. Ok, i'll do it at weekend. > Please covert vma_prio_tree_next in arch/* directories if you > plan to post a new version of your 3rd patch. Oh, sorry. I promise, i will read man grep 3 times. > However, your 1st patch is intrusive and I am not convinced > that it improves the code very much. > Overall I am inclined to leave the prio_tree code as it is. Yes, i understand, it changes working code without real gain. However, i will send it as 3rd patch, in the case you will change you mind. Thank you, Oleg.