mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
	syzbot <syzbot+174de899852504e4a74a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
	syzbot+3d1c772efafd3c38d007@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in rxrpc_send_data_packet
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:12:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4107618.1612174356@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201094403.1979-1-hdanton@sina.com>

Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> wrote:

> --- a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
> +++ b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
> @@ -549,6 +549,7 @@ void rxrpc_release_call(struct rxrpc_soc
>  	if (call->security)
>  		call->security->free_call_crypto(call);
>  
> +	cancel_work_sync(&call->processor);
>  	rxrpc_cleanup_ring(call);
>  	_leave("");
>  }

It's probably better to do the cancellation before we call
->free_call_crypto().

Two other alternatives would be to lock in rxrpc_cleanup_ring() or just remove
that call of rxrpc_cleanup_ring() and leave it to rxrpc_cleanup_call() (which
calls it anyway).  The latter might be the best option as the work function
holds a ref on the call.

Clearing the ring in rxrpc_release_call() is more of an optimisation, meant to
recycle skbuffs sooner, but I would hope that the call would be destroyed
quickly after this point anyway.

David


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210201094403.1979-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-02-01  8:03 ` syzbot
2021-02-01 10:12   ` David Howells [this message]
2021-02-01 11:05   ` David Howells
2021-02-01 11:05     ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4107618.1612174356@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+174de899852504e4a74a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzbot+3d1c772efafd3c38d007@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®