Re: [PATCH 2.6.8-rc2] include/linux/ata.h

[Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>]

Andrew Chew wrote:
> The macros ata_id_has_lba() and ata_id_has_dma() seem to have their bits
> reversed.  LBA support is bit 9 of word 49 in the identify page, whereas
> DMA support is bit 8 of word 49 in the identify page.
> 
> 
> --- ata.original.h	2004-07-19 17:49:26.000000000 -0700
> +++ ata.h	2004-07-19 17:49:05.000000000 -0700
> @@ -209,8 +209,8 @@
>  #define ata_id_has_lba48(dev)	((dev)->id[83] & (1 << 10))
>  #define ata_id_has_wcache(dev)	((dev)->id[82] & (1 << 5))
>  #define ata_id_has_pm(dev)	((dev)->id[82] & (1 << 3))
> -#define ata_id_has_lba(dev)	((dev)->id[49] & (1 << 8))
> -#define ata_id_has_dma(dev)	((dev)->id[49] & (1 << 9))
> +#define ata_id_has_lba(dev)	((dev)->id[49] & (1 << 9))
> +#define ata_id_has_dma(dev)	((dev)->id[49] & (1 << 8))
>  #define ata_id_removeable(dev)	((dev)->id[0] & (1 << 7))
>  #define ata_id_u32(dev,n)	\
>  	(((u32) (dev)->id[(n) + 1] << 16) | ((u32) (dev)->id[(n)]))


Patch looks good, but please submit patches generated from the base of 
the kernel tree, so that "patch -sp1 < patch" successfully applies your 
patch.

I am applying this patch manually...

	Jeff