From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>,
Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>, Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net 1/3] bonding: move IPsec deletion to bond_ipsec_free_sa
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 10:38:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4108bfd8-b19f-46ea-8820-47dd8fb9ee7c@blackwall.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304131120.31135-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com>
On 3/4/25 15:11, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> The fixed commit placed mutex_lock() inside spin_lock_bh(), which triggers
> a warning:
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at...
>
> Fix this by moving the IPsec deletion operation to bond_ipsec_free_sa,
> which is not held by spin_lock_bh().
>
> Additionally, delete the IPsec list in bond_ipsec_del_sa_all() when the
> XFRM state is DEAD to prevent xdo_dev_state_free() from being triggered
> again in bond_ipsec_free_sa().
>
> For bond_ipsec_free_sa(), there are now three conditions:
>
> 1. if (!slave): When no active device exists.
> 2. if (!xs->xso.real_dev): When xdo_dev_state_add() fails.
> 3. if (xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev): When an xs has already been freed
> by bond_ipsec_del_sa_all() due to migration, and the active slave has
> changed to a new device. At the same time, the xs is marked as DEAD
> due to the XFRM entry is removed, triggering xfrm_state_gc_task() and
> bond_ipsec_free_sa().
>
> In all three cases, xdo_dev_state_free() should not be called, only xs
> should be removed from bond->ipsec list.
>
> At the same time, protect bond_ipsec_del_sa_all and bond_ipsec_add_sa_all
> with x->lock for each xs being processed. This prevents XFRM from
> concurrently initiating add/delete operations on the managed states.
>
> Fixes: 2aeeef906d5a ("bonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex")
> Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241212062734.182a0164@kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index e45bba240cbc..06b060d9b031 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -537,15 +537,22 @@ static void bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
> }
>
> list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
> + spin_lock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
> + /* Skip dead xfrm states, they'll be freed later. */
> + if (ipsec->xs->km.state == XFRM_STATE_DEAD)
> + goto next;
> +
> /* If new state is added before ipsec_lock acquired */
> if (ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev == real_dev)
> - continue;
> + goto next;
>
> ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
> if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(ipsec->xs, NULL)) {
> slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev, "%s: failed to add SA\n", __func__);
> ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
> }
> +next:
> + spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
> }
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
> @@ -560,7 +567,6 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
> struct net_device *bond_dev = xs->xso.dev;
> struct net_device *real_dev;
> netdevice_tracker tracker;
> - struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
> struct bonding *bond;
> struct slave *slave;
>
> @@ -592,15 +598,6 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
> real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(xs);
> out:
> netdev_put(real_dev, &tracker);
> - mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
> - list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
> - if (ipsec->xs == xs) {
> - list_del(&ipsec->list);
> - kfree(ipsec);
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> - mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
> }
>
> static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
> @@ -617,8 +614,18 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
>
> mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
Second time - you should use list_for_each_entry_safe if you're walking and deleting
elements from the list.
> + spin_lock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
> if (!ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev)
> - continue;
> + goto next;
> +
> + if (ipsec->xs->km.state == XFRM_STATE_DEAD) {
> + /* already dead no need to delete again */
> + if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
> + real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
Have you checked if .xdo_dev_state_free can sleep?
I see at least one that can: mlx5e_xfrm_free_state().
> + list_del(&ipsec->list);
> + kfree(ipsec);
> + goto next;
> + }
>
> if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
> !real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete ||
> @@ -631,6 +638,8 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
> if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
> real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
> }
> +next:
> + spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
> }
> mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
> }
> @@ -640,6 +649,7 @@ static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
> struct net_device *bond_dev = xs->xso.dev;
> struct net_device *real_dev;
> netdevice_tracker tracker;
> + struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
> struct bonding *bond;
> struct slave *slave;
>
> @@ -659,11 +669,22 @@ static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
> if (!xs->xso.real_dev)
> goto out;
>
> - WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev);
> + mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
> + if (ipsec->xs == xs) {
> + /* do xdo_dev_state_free if real_dev matches,
> + * otherwise only remove the list
> + */
> + if (real_dev && real_dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
> + real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
> + real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(xs);
> + list_del(&ipsec->list);
> + kfree(ipsec);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
>
> - if (real_dev && real_dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
> - real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
> - real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(xs);
> out:
> netdev_put(real_dev, &tracker);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 13:11 [PATCHv4 net 0/3] bond: fix xfrm offload issues Hangbin Liu
2025-03-04 13:11 ` [PATCHv4 net 1/3] bonding: move IPsec deletion to bond_ipsec_free_sa Hangbin Liu
2025-03-05 8:38 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2025-03-05 14:13 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-05 16:12 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-06 9:37 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-06 10:02 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-06 13:29 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-06 13:37 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-07 2:39 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-06 13:04 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-04 13:11 ` [PATCHv4 net 2/3] bonding: fix xfrm offload feature setup on active-backup mode Hangbin Liu
2025-03-04 13:11 ` [PATCHv4 net 3/3] selftests: bonding: add ipsec offload test Hangbin Liu
2025-03-05 10:13 ` Petr Machata
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4108bfd8-b19f-46ea-8820-47dd8fb9ee7c@blackwall.org \
--to=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=jianbol@nvidia.com \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®