From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758270Ab0EYA5K (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2010 20:57:10 -0400 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:48393 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757254Ab0EYA5I (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2010 20:57:08 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck: OK by SHieldMailChecker v1.5.1 Message-ID: <410FE99A91C44DBB9195120FE1434FE0@rainbow> From: "Iram Shahzad" To: "Tim Bird" Cc: References: <06EE497F774E482693005209CB740D6A@rainbow> <4BFB0C77.2030904@am.sony.com> Subject: Re: FUNCTION_TRACER: can it be used to trace early bootup functions Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 09:58:44 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tim Many thanks for the information. I am sorry I did not mention that my purpose this time is to know the calling sequence of the functions rather than to measure the timings. Anyway the information is useful to me. It seems there is another tracing mechanism called KFT. http://elinux.org/Kernel_Function_Trace >>From the examples in the above URL, it looks like it can start tracing from start_kernel. But it seems it is neither mainlined nor actively maintained. Any idea about its status? Thanks Iram