From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269245AbUHZRwz (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:52:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269190AbUHZQed (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:34:33 -0400 Received: from mail2.srv.poptel.org.uk ([213.55.4.14]:25608 "HELO mail2.srv.poptel.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S269191AbUHZQ3z (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:29:55 -0400 Message-ID: <412E0F91.7000508@phonecoop.coop> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:28:01 +0100 From: Alan Jenkins User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040114 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: cdrecord alternatives: libburn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org People on the list have recently expressed dissatisfaction with cdrecord and its development process, and IIRC one person appeared to volunteer to prototype an alternative (I couldn't find the original email/author). I found a project just now which may be of interest: http://icculus.org/burn/. It is obviouslly not as well-known and developed as cdrecord. Hope this email doesn't raise the noise/signal ratio on LKML too much