From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-111.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-111.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84FBD18E024 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 09:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.111 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724146637; cv=none; b=dasXxKDmqhm6tF71EeRG8RVROcb0UBpeQf4lB9CXtR51sq5ah44R1l4xFcQkKWCQY9i7WBzMUZLh19u5+O/oDA9K6J621TTL5SV7lW90Uuc/fatjtyNHIDfyTLEhswImx8XcXKW6BQ2mAN3erucaQ4gj5jaDgrgzZs6T6B51h0A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724146637; c=relaxed/simple; bh=c0+Cpp2MEiJrYS849mGqNWpqtLBFu8w0Hu72h4/iaOY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=mDen/q3E5Wi8yurRxgdPXd+LiutPt9tOtn2+prb5kzf53BT6juATNdx5Lr5o//ENe+DuzRBXLzjKLHIrZvS7J3kJUzcd/LUBtzUbu5qrqL1o82QS3qhDTTMsuBrUaElh5t52MorYh0K1smzLnVZF6Ykh7JZhh7P0E7BmsjruX/k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=BIUUqygJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.111 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="BIUUqygJ" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1724146626; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=l2+jDibFcpxXd+8JTIGUgTimQc0/BrFrXtvpGWrXZNI=; b=BIUUqygJonJKevlVRZzaD/QP2Qd7scNjm8QPtz93TrZXe9iSbE48vkTW1GkDqH13+j3F9hJcHyjFSobdT1zbT9ZUZp6/nUmo2ohlObumQFrSojTVpNy4rRrayBbT4J++k8g6SFlq8atsTKjsk1YkS6ONMmNMtH99fO/lWADzP00= Received: from 30.221.130.129(mailfrom:hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0WDI3eJo_1724146624) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 17:37:05 +0800 Message-ID: <4130fe2b-59eb-47ac-9e14-0274bffdefc0@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 17:37:04 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: allow large folios for compressed files To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, Chao Yu , LKML , Matthew Wilcox References: <20240819025207.3808649-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> From: Gao Xiang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2024/8/20 17:29, Barry Song wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 2:52 PM Gao Xiang wrote: >> >> As commit 2e6506e1c4ee ("mm/migrate: fix deadlock in >> migrate_pages_batch() on large folios") already landed upstream, >> large folios can be safely enabled for compressed inodes since all >> prerequisites already landed in 6.11-rc1. >> >> Stress tests has been working on my fleet for > 20 days without any >> regression. Besides, users [1] has requested it for months. Let's >> allow large folios for EROFS full cases upstream now for wider testing. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAGsJ_4wtE8OcpinuqVwG4jtdx6Qh5f+TON6wz+4HMCq=A2qFcA@mail.gmail.com >> Cc: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> >> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) >> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang > > Thank you, Xiang! We'll run some tests and update you with our findings. Yeah, findings and patches are welcome as always. Thanks, Gao Xiang