From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423300AbcFGVYf (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:24:35 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.134]:53208 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1160995AbcFGVYd (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:24:33 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Dave Hansen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] generic syscalls: wire up memory protection keys syscalls Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 23:25:20 +0200 Message-ID: <4151348.Xje1rehFl0@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-22-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160607204725.A731CB1E@viggo.jf.intel.com> References: <20160607204712.594DE00A@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20160607204725.A731CB1E@viggo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Cch9NAtoEnub7gha1lpGpGhmuHfSV4vgUZnrJa+J5jGatecZB3+ zSf+4Yg/0/POxgD5Utnlrdg15z93dwmP9/eHR0iMcuvO9sNDDDu/QUGC31Zl+gXCylBn3mi A/rI3HSyx5yWES1JneK4nm733mEjBLvKlT1laeeiQsQFVam/bVIiOPMvER7wQFvNAKglM4T b7xlsF6nv8rffeUVAvPqA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:+r266JU1LYM=:/gaZL60gaGsl8OBtMYaoCc 38M/m0jFK5o3dTLG08GqzAqjYMmbt5GTgrttxWNkaXCmldAmcfOe/Mz6YHEltXdYABH8ve3cd CnzqSSe3LgLK14SH36L7tY8Y/pG53RbO1EkRD5m+6CjvUY7tPxZr98G3JQMb3gEZ7n6vkIOZ3 IjsG7Z8nh4FjG4dwDZkX4eOV6nrwEHaawdhQoGfv4h03fOw11CDu6A2q1A3zcwHC3wAzQbMMD UApJElTfaxqOdBnSFkpRlLv/VWcb14N++g0qtcR+xdODpdiB7f8duDrNNOT34Y5+VI3rfIkdZ Ym3izIgSm0kXeNz3E6LH2Jv+x6uOBvVjmlPXEUl8qkJebokTp19V0wwVvp3pTzgF2fucx8zw/ UrezqTZng92oi1EeRmi1SfENw+xVm2who1IwMQrLEImoa+XiAaSC8Z61pzuz1Se99cFCoMl0M zF8h8Aa6G2AvcpC00uu5VZxBA5CyJITPIDkyLkQFJEnWhrHotgNBC8+JeWBSVb1THmaFPH24V tlP99B7wr5Ta1GVSYJsqFM514ZLBGS1uLmcKGsW33a/jpnWjEvB7W3FAKqTnqkN0xLS642tjA FpzUDMjooewJnNSo/gN/zupuOjtoho0+Qq179mEurIj/TPoMtRWf2PwKHCgfsEEuXd9EI2YQU xNry9T8385N8cC14j6++Meaa/oT/vIb8j8JgtbqQHiUGkElhLQyy75b6chDR3ZIFx0v4Bpm84 NFu1XotKhzqfTt4a Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 1:47:25 PM CEST Dave Hansen wrote: > From: Dave Hansen > > These new syscalls are implemented as generic code, so enable > them for architectures like arm64 which use the generic syscall > table. > > According to Arnd: > > Even if the support is x86 specific for the forseeable > future, it may be good to reserve the number just in > case. The other architecture specific syscall lists are > usually left to the individual arch maintainers, most a > lot of the newer architectures share this table. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen > Cc: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Thanks!