From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>, Qipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, mika.westerberg@intel.com,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI/PM: Revert "PCI/PM: Drop unused runtime PM support code for PCIe ports"
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:10:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41526334.QosPv6IFu0@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160119215234.GH14080@localhost>
On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 03:52:34 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Rafael, author of fe9a743a2601]
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:27:44PM +0800, Qipeng Zha wrote:
> > This reverts commit fe9a743a2601 ("PCI/PM: Drop unused runtime
> > PM support code for PCIe ports"). To support PCIe ports
> > runtime PM for Intel Broxton platform.
>
> This changelog is not as useful as it could be. It's true that this
> reverts fe9a743a2601, but what's important is that this adds support
> code for runtime PM of PCIe ports, so that should be mentioned first.
>
> The fe9a743a2601 changelog says "If we are to support runtime PM of
> PCIe ports, it will have to be done in a different way most likely
> anyway." I don't know what Rafael had in mind there, but we certainly
> need to ask him before adding it back the same way it was.
Thanks!
The previous approach had a few problems that showed up in testing and
that's why the code was first disabled and then removed from the kernel.
We can't re-enable it or those problems will show up again.
I have not looked at adding PCIe port runtime PM support in a cleaner
way yet, but it is on my radar.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-19 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-15 14:27 Qipeng Zha
2016-01-15 14:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI/PM: enable runtime PM support for Intel Broxton platform Qipeng Zha
2016-01-19 21:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-19 21:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI/PM: Revert "PCI/PM: Drop unused runtime PM support code for PCIe ports" Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-19 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-02-18 9:43 Qipeng Zha
2016-02-18 1:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41526334.QosPv6IFu0@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@intel.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=qipeng.zha@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®