From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757278AbdEYIzB (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2017 04:55:01 -0400 Received: from fllnx209.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.16]:61814 "EHLO fllnx209.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756935AbdEYIyz (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2017 04:54:55 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: pcf857x: move header file out of I2C realm To: Linus Walleij , Wolfram Sang CC: "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , Kevin Hilman , Russell King , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , Jonathan Cameron , Ralf Baechle , Alexandre Courbot , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux MIPS , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" References: <20170521215727.1243-1-wsa@the-dreams.de> <20170521215727.1243-3-wsa@the-dreams.de> From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: <41555985-34c3-da9c-e4a4-f61d4eb2ec38@ti.com> Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 14:22:04 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Tuesday 23 May 2017 03:05 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> include/linux/i2c is not for client devices. Move the header file to a >> more appropriate location. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c | 2 +- >> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c | 2 +- >> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c | 2 +- >> arch/arm/mach-pxa/balloon3.c | 2 +- >> arch/arm/mach-pxa/stargate2.c | 2 +- >> arch/mips/ath79/mach-pb44.c | 2 +- >> drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c | 2 +- >> include/linux/{i2c => platform_data}/pcf857x.h | 0 >> 8 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> rename include/linux/{i2c => platform_data}/pcf857x.h (100%) > > Patch applied. > > BTW ARM SoC maintainers be warned, I optimistically assume this will > not collide with any ARM SoC work... Thanks for the heads-up. The mach-davinci part does not clash with anything I have queued. I added this patch to a branch of my tree which I merge together but don't sent upstream. So I will know if I end up queuing anything which clashes. Thanks, Sekhar