From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934298AbXG2Sqj (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:46:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932429AbXG2Sqc (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:46:32 -0400 Received: from web52004.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.49.251]:22651 "HELO web52004.mail.re2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1759887AbXG2Sqb (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:46:31 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 400 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:46:31 EDT DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=VssE8rksVsl9fiNRv1cya9LemLVkfGnVe5kzkuNzl5JAFsKi4qxbEkzPbaCnbIO1V/877XdDkIkpC4OsNXaFTUs4taD4AVMRjvFEAp7x5/JxU9Df+xCMZ2SSDfsuMWA7CWPCJzM/WxAvpkQSvhk/cu4cZJArBSzZsL36lhcsrio=; X-YMail-OSG: jzN3KbAVM1kmwlBZVwL8W4CAEwdfNNMGc5JuupN9UFxZfmA1yoxVZWd11dgD2_gMxgMhtVnpQAgoEbzj1mJZm4_H1Rb6cOgR14Ovijv79hrc6b2xe4p0pVy5f7oHmZb9BnYdv.foqshejD0- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:39:50 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hendrik ." Subject: Re: Reading a bad sector does not report failure as 'read error' but hangs PC with 'Machine Check Exception' To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <46ACB357.4030006@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: <415666.7221.qm@web52004.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Probably a similar problem is described in the linux-ide mailing list a while ago: http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/jgarzik@pobox.com/6490911.html >> Argh. I'm seeing a show stopper bug on sata_nv here. >> ata_exec_internal >> is MCE-ing on the READ_NATIVE_MAX_EXT command on >> both i386 and amd64, with >> top of Linus' tree + this patch. :( > >Oddly, the command at least executes and doesn't MCE >(but it's not at all >happy either) if I use ATA_PROT_PIO. I wonder if >ATA_PROT_NODATA is buggered on this sata_nv chip >(Asus A8N-E). At least it is a similar motherboard that is used (however I have explicitly have the A8N-E Deluxe edition). I try not to repair my SATA disk for now with the Seatools, so if there is some testing to be done, I can run it with the bad disk. Regards, Hendrik ____________________________________________________________________________________ Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC