mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jiale yao" <19888972804@163.com>
To: "Mark Fasheh" <mark@fasheh.com>,
	"Joel Becker" <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	"Joseph Qi" <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"ZhengYuan Huang" <gality369@gmail.com>,
	ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re:[PATCH] ocfs2: validate filecheck inode slots
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2026 21:59:22 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41659397.1e4f.1a0de0370ab.Coremail.19888972804@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260926135354.3420193-1-yaojiale02@163.com>

At 2026-09-26 21:53:53, "Jiale Yao" <yaojiale02@163.com> wrote:
>The online filecheck path reads inodes with
>ocfs2_filecheck_validate_inode_block() instead of
>ocfs2_validate_inode_block().  It does not check the slot fields that
>are used as indices into arrays sized by osb->max_slots.
>
>A corrupted dinode can set OCFS2_ORPHANED_FL or
>OCFS2_DIO_ORPHANED_FL while carrying an out-of-range orphan slot.  An
>out-of-range i_suballoc_slot can also bypass the normal validator
>through the filecheck path.  These values can later be used to index
>the slot-local system inode array.

Reproduced on 7.3-rc4 (x86_64 QEMU, KASAN):

[   45.942783] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ocfs2_evict_inode+0x28f7/0x3ac0
[   45.942818] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881
[   45.942827] Call Trace:
[   45.942829]  dump_stack_lvl+0x2d/0x70
[   45.942833]  print_report+0x175/0x7d0
[   45.942836]  kasan_report+0x139/0x170
[   45.942839]  ocfs2_evict_inode+0x28f7/0x3ac0
[   45.942840]  evict+0x344/0x6e0
[   45.942842]  ? iput+0x45d/0x730
[   45.942843]  ocfs2_filecheck_attr_store+0x96a/0xd30
[   45.942846]  ocfs2_filecheck_store+0x5d/0x90
[   45.942847]  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x262/0x370
[   45.942849]  vfs_write+0x933/0xcb0
[   45.942852]  ksys_write+0xf2/0x1b0
[   45.942853]  do_syscall_64+0x15b/0x420
[   45.942856]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
...
[   45.942867] Allocated by task 81:
[   45.942870]  __kasan_kmalloc+0x72/0x90
[   45.942871]  __kmalloc_noprof+0x1d2/0x470
[   45.942875]  ocfs2_fill_super+0x195b/0x59f0s, ...)
[   45.942885] The buggy address is located 4 bytes to the right of
[   45.942885]  allocated 4-byte region [ffff888105f04a40, ffff888105f04a44)
[   45.942910] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical
           address ... (the pointer read past inode)

>Mirror the normal validator's slot checks in the filecheck validator.
>Reject invalid slots in the repair path as well, since the correct
>slot cannot be recovered.
>
>Fixes: bb88131c9831 ("ocfs2: validate DIO orphan slot during inode read")
>Signed-off-by: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
>---
> fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
>index 180107a11046..ab82cf9146ef 100644
>--- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
>+++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
>@@ -1754,6 +1754,44 @@ int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
> 	return rc;
> }
> 
>+/*
>+ * Validate the slot fields used as indices into arrays sized by
>+ * osb->max_slots.  The filecheck path uses this validator instead of
>+ * ocfs2_validate_inode_block(), so it must enforce the same bounds.
>+ */
>+static int ocfs2_filecheck_validate_slots(struct super_block *sb,
>+					  struct ocfs2_dinode *di,
>+					  unsigned long long blkno)
>+{
>+	struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(sb);
>+
>+	if (le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot) != (u16)OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT &&
>+	    (u32)le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot) > osb->max_slots - 1) {
>+		mlog(ML_ERROR,
>+		     "Filecheck: invalid dinode #%llu: suballoc slot %u\n",
>+		     blkno, le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot));
>+		return -OCFS2_FILECHECK_ERR_INVALIDINO;
>+	}
>+
>+	if ((le32_to_cpu(di->i_flags) & OCFS2_ORPHANED_FL) &&
>+	    le16_to_cpu(di->i_orphaned_slot) >= osb->max_slots) {
>+		mlog(ML_ERROR,
>+		     "Filecheck: invalid dinode #%llu: orphaned slot %u\n",
>+		     blkno, le16_to_cpu(di->i_orphaned_slot));
>+		return -OCFS2_FILECHECK_ERR_INVALIDINO;
>+	}
>+
>+	if ((le32_to_cpu(di->i_flags) & OCFS2_DIO_ORPHANED_FL) &&
>+	    le16_to_cpu(di->i_dio_orphaned_slot) >= osb->max_slots) {
>+		mlog(ML_ERROR,
>+		     "Filecheck: invalid dinode #%llu: DIO orphaned slot %u\n",
>+		     blkno, le16_to_cpu(di->i_dio_orphaned_slot));
>+		return -OCFS2_FILECHECK_ERR_INVALIDINO;
>+	}
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
> static int ocfs2_filecheck_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
> 						struct buffer_head *bh)
> {
>@@ -1835,6 +1873,10 @@ static int ocfs2_filecheck_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
> 		goto bail;
> 	}
> 
>+	rc = ocfs2_filecheck_validate_slots(sb, di, bh->b_blocknr);
>+	if (rc)
>+		goto bail;
>+
> 	if (ocfs2_dinode_has_size_without_clusters(sb, di)) {
> 		if (S_ISDIR(le16_to_cpu(di->i_mode)))
> 			mlog(ML_ERROR,
>@@ -1893,6 +1935,9 @@ static int ocfs2_filecheck_repair_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
> 		return -OCFS2_FILECHECK_ERR_VALIDFLAG;
> 	}
> 
>+	if (ocfs2_filecheck_validate_slots(sb, di, bh->b_blocknr))
>+		return -OCFS2_FILECHECK_ERR_INVALIDINO;
>+
> 	if (le64_to_cpu(di->i_blkno) != bh->b_blocknr) {
> 		di->i_blkno = cpu_to_le64(bh->b_blocknr);
> 		changed = 1;
>-- 
>2.34.1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-26 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-26 13:53 [PATCH] " Jiale Yao
2026-09-26 13:59 ` jiale yao [this message]
2026-09-28  9:58 ` Joseph Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41659397.1e4f.1a0de0370ab.Coremail.19888972804@163.com \
    --to=19888972804@163.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gality369@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®