From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966186AbbDWOfJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:35:09 -0400 Received: from mail.eperm.de ([89.247.134.16]:34302 "EHLO mail.eperm.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965787AbbDWOfH (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:35:07 -0400 From: Stephan Mueller To: Paul Bolle Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, Andreas Steffen , "Theodore Ts'o" , Sandy Harris , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] crypto: add jitterentropy RNG Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:26:23 +0200 Message-ID: <4170874.MzN8F3hvVD@myon.chronox.de> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.6 (Linux/3.19.3-200.fc21.x86_64; KDE/4.14.6; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1429798711.2927.8.camel@x220> References: <5054521.el7mZro33c@myon.chronox.de> <3179693.vMYTrm5f8Q@myon.chronox.de> <1429798711.2927.8.camel@x220> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Donnerstag, 23. April 2015, 16:18:31 schrieb Paul Bolle: Hi Paul, > On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 16:08 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: > > Other patches that are in the kernel that I wrote (e.g. > > the crypto/drbg.c) have the same license as above, but use > > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") -- Thus I would think that leaving it as is should > > be > > ok. > > Why not submit the trivial patches to make the license comment and the > MODULE_LICENSE() macro match in those files too? Well, ok, I can do that. I will wait for further comments on the patch set before I resubmit the patch set with the license change as suggested. > > Thanks, > > > Paul Bolle -- Ciao Stephan