From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.12?
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 08:02:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <418760000.1117983740@[10.10.2.4]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050604151120.46b51901.akpm@osdl.org>
--Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote (on Saturday, June 04, 2005 15:11:20 -0700):
> "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote:
>>
>> The one that worries me is that my x86_64 box won't boot since -rc3
>> See:
>>
>> http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mbligh/abat/regression_matrix.html
>
> All the MPT_FUSION config variables got renamed, so a simple `make
> oldconfig' results in a kernel qhich does precisely what your machine is
> doing there.
Not sure what you mean. 2.6.11 has (in drivers/message/fusion/Kconfig)
config FUSION
config FUSION_MAX_SGE
config FUSION_CTL
config FUSION_LAN
2.6.12-rc3 has:
config FUSION
config FUSION_MAX_SGE
config FUSION_CTL
config FUSION_LAN
So I don't think they changed, AFAICS. The config in question has:
CONFIG_FUSION=y
CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_SGE=40
# CONFIG_FUSION_CTL is not set
# CONFIG_SOUND_FUSION is not set
And I'd backed out the rc3 drivers to rc2 (the whole of drivers/message/fusion)
and it doesn't fix it.
I also get several different failure modes, in different trees, one of
which is:
^M^@Testing NMI watchdog ... <3>BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#3!
^M
^M^@Modules linked in:
^M^@Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.12-rc2-mm2-autokern1
^M^@RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff80254eda>] <ffffffff80254eda>{__delay+10}
^M^@RSP: 0000:ffff8100e3f23f00 EFLAGS: 00000216
^M^@RAX: 00000000001b144e RBX: ffffffff801af3d7 RCX: 000000007c1f2aa5
^M^@RDX: 000000000000006b RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: 00000000001b4c48
^M^@RBP: 0000ffffffff8010 R08: 0000000000000720 R09: ffff8100e3f543e8
^M^@R10: 00000000001d92d4 R11: ffffffff8025aa40 R12: ffff8100e3f543e8
^M^@R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000002
^M^@FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff804dfe00(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
^M^@CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
^M^@CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000000101000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
^M
^M^@Call Trace:<ffffffff804f3b15>{check_nmi_watchdog+181} <ffffffff8010c249>{ini
t+505}
^M^@ <ffffffff8010f3ff>{child_rip+8} <ffffffff8010c050>{init+0}
^M^@ <ffffffff8010f3f7>{child_rip+0}
^M^@CPU#0: NMI appears to be stuck (24)!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-05 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-03 22:24 2.6.12? Jeff Garzik
2005-06-03 23:37 ` 2.6.12? Francois Romieu
2005-06-04 8:36 ` 2.6.12? Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 11:33 ` 2.6.12? Francois Romieu
2005-06-04 20:59 ` 2.6.12? Jeff Garzik
2005-06-03 23:38 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-03 23:55 ` 2.6.12? Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 0:05 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-06 10:56 ` 2.6.12? Takashi Iwai
2005-06-04 0:01 ` 2.6.12? Wakko Warner
2005-06-04 0:51 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-04 0:03 ` 2.6.12? Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-04 1:19 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-04 0:05 ` 2.6.12? Brice Goglin
2005-06-04 1:21 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-07 14:43 ` 2.6.12? Brice Goglin
2005-06-07 15:53 ` 2.6.12? Sylvain Meyer
2005-06-08 8:02 ` 2.6.12? Brice Goglin
2005-06-04 0:34 ` 2.6.12? Dave Jones
2005-06-04 1:50 ` 2.6.12? Dmitry Torokhov
2005-06-04 8:15 ` 2.6.12? Russell King
2005-06-04 9:25 ` 2.6.12? Johannes Stezenbach
2005-06-04 12:25 ` 2.6.12? Michael Krufky
2005-06-04 14:23 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-04 14:35 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-04 15:24 ` 2.6.12? Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-06-04 22:11 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-05 15:02 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2005-06-07 18:16 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-07 19:24 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-08 12:56 ` 2.6.12? Andi Kleen
2005-06-08 19:47 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-08 23:04 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-09 4:44 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-09 19:45 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-09 13:41 ` 2.6.12? Andi Kleen
2005-06-06 22:06 ` 2.6.12? Adam Belay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='418760000.1117983740@[10.10.2.4]' \
--to=mbligh@mbligh.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®