Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>>add requeue task
> 
> 
> ack for this bit, but please split this one out:
> 
> | Change the granularity code to requeue tasks at their best priority
> | instead of changing priority while they're running. This keeps tasks 
> | at their top interactive level during their whole timeslice.
> 
> this is a behavioral change and should go into the 'possible negative
> effect on interactivity' bucket. (of course it could very likely have a
> positive effect as well - the bucket is just to separate the risks.)

Actually I'd like to say I did it for positive effect to counter the 
change that occurred with dropping interactive credit. That was what I 
found in my testing, and I'd like them both to go together into -mm.

Con