Nick Piggin wrote:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
>>
>> Good idea. BTW, any reason why the following (very)micro optimisation
>> shouldn't go in?
>>
>> It currently only picks up a couple of things under fs/, but might help
>> reduce other ifdefery around the place. For example mm.h: page_count and
>> get_page.
>>
> 
> Like this, perhaps? It does actually introduce a change in the object
> code. Namely hugetlb's put_page will now also be done inline for non
> compound pages - maybe this change is unacceptable though, but it does
> cut down the ifdefs.

Err... attached.