Con Kolivas wrote:
> Logistically what makes sense is if a timeout of 0 is used as a test 
> that completely disables it (avoids another sysctl too). In time for 
> 2.6.10 we should disable it by default until the regressions are better 
> understood. Tuning it into a useful "on" position can happen later and I 
> suspect requires more code.

This patch should have the desired effect.

Con