From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261638AbUL3PMo (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:12:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261651AbUL3PMo (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:12:44 -0500 Received: from mail.tv-sign.ru ([213.234.233.51]:63128 "EHLO several.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261638AbUL3PMn (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:12:43 -0500 Message-ID: <41D429A2.4CDCCE7C@tv-sign.ru> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:15:30 +0300 From: Oleg Nesterov X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manfred Spraul Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 2.6.10] rcu: simplify quiescent state detection References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Manfred Spraul wrote: > > No, it's not needed. Actually: not even a counter is needed, just > a flag that indicates that there was a quiescent state. > Yes, this patch is obviously better. Oleg.