mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hawkes@sgi.com (John Hawkes)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rml@novell.com
Subject: 2.6.10-mm3 scaling problem with inotify
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:51:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41E717A8.Mail7BE150TM8@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> (raw)

I believe I've encountered a scaling problem with the inotify code in
2.6.10-mm3.

vfs_read() and vfs_write() (for example) do:
    dnotify_parent(dentry, DN_ACCESS);
    inotify_dentry_parent_queue_event(dentry,
                           IN_ACCESS, 0, dentry->d_name.name);
    inotify_inode_queue_event(inode, IN_ACCESS, 0, NULL);
for the optional "notify" functionality.

dnotify_parent() knows how to exit quickly:
       if (!dir_notify_enable)
                return;
looking at a global flag, and inotify_inode_queue_event() also knows a quick
exit:
        if (!inode->inotify_data)
                return;
However, inotify_dentry_parent_queue_event() first has to get the parent 
dentry:
        parent = dget_parent(dentry);
        inotify_inode_queue_event(parent->d_inode, mask, cookie, filename);
        dput(parent);
and, sadly, dget_parent(dentry) grabs a spinlock (dentry->d_lock) and dirties a cacheline (dentry->dcount).  I have an AIM7-like workload that does numerous
concurrent reads and suffers a 40% drop in performance because of this.

Is it possible for a parent's inode->inotify_data to be enabled when none of 
its children's inotify_data are enabled?  That would make it easy - just look 
at the current inode's inotify_data before walking back to the parent.

John Hawkes

             reply	other threads:[~2005-01-14  1:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-14  0:51 John Hawkes [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-14  2:31 Zou, Nanhai
2005-01-14  2:36 ` John McCutchan
2005-01-14  2:41 ` Robert Love
2005-01-13 23:56 John Hawkes
2005-01-14  0:49 ` Robert Love
2005-01-14  1:31   ` John McCutchan
2005-01-14  2:29     ` Robert Love
2005-01-14 18:05       ` John Hawkes
2005-01-14 18:15         ` Robert Love
2005-01-14 18:39           ` John Hawkes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41E717A8.Mail7BE150TM8@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=hawkes@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rml@novell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome