Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:14:21AM -0600, Brian King wrote:
> 
>>Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>>>As Brian said the device he was working with would just not answer,
>>>leading to a bus abort.  This would get ffffffff on a PC.
>>>You could simulate this if you want, although I think a EBUSY or EIO
>>>is better.
>>
>>Alan - are you satisfied with the most recent patch, or would you prefer 
>>the patch not returning failure return codes and just bit bucketing 
>>writes and returning all ff's on reads? Either way works for me.
> 
> 
> Hmm, I think i haven't seen a recent patch. But as long as it doesn't
> block in pci_config_* and is light weight there it's fine for me.
> 
> -Andi
> 

Here is my latest patch.


-- 
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center