From: "Chris Leech" <chris.leech@gmail.com>
To: "Evgeniy Polyakov" <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: "Krzysztof Oledzki" <olel@ans.pl>,
"Arnd Hannemann" <arnd@arndnet.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: problems with e1000 and jumboframes
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:16:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41b516cb0608040816o63ac2f72q20add7619734906@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060804062008.GC413@2ka.mipt.ru>
On 8/3/06, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:
> > You're changing the size of the buffer without telling the hardware.
> > In the interrupt context e1000 knows the size of what was DMAed into
> > the skb, but that's after the fact. So e1000 could detect that memory
> > was corrupted, but not prevent it if you don't give it power of 2
> > buffers. Actually, the power of 2 thing doesn't hold true for all
> > e1000 devices. Some have 1k granularity, but not Arnd's 82540.
>
> I can not change it - code checks if requested mtu and additional size
> is less than allocated aligned buffer it tricks allocator.
> Or do you mean that even after 9k mtu was setup it is possible that card
> can receive packets up to 16k?
Yes, that's exactly what I mean. For anything above the standard 1500
bytes the e1000 _hardware_ has no concept of MTU, only buffer length.
So even if the driver is set to an MTU of 9000, the NIC will still
receive 16k frames. Otherwise the driver would simply allocate MTU
sized buffers.
-Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-04 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-03 13:48 Arnd Hannemann
2006-08-03 13:59 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-03 14:37 ` Arnd Hannemann
2006-08-03 15:03 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-03 15:08 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-08-03 15:16 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-03 15:37 ` Arnd Hannemann
2006-08-03 15:43 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-03 15:41 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-03 18:09 ` Arnd Hannemann
2006-08-03 18:29 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-03 21:40 ` Arnd Hannemann
2006-08-03 15:57 ` Chris Leech
2006-08-03 16:10 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-03 20:32 ` Chris Leech
2006-08-04 6:20 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-04 15:16 ` Chris Leech [this message]
2006-08-03 16:24 ` Arnd Hannemann
2006-08-03 20:34 ` Chris Leech
2006-08-04 5:59 ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-04 6:15 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-04 15:34 ` Chris Leech
2006-08-04 19:42 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-04 21:02 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-08-05 9:58 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-05 10:09 ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-05 10:24 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-05 10:33 ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-05 10:41 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-03 15:23 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-04 5:52 ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-04 5:55 ` David Miller
2006-08-04 5:58 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-03 14:24 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-08-03 14:49 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-08-03 14:52 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-08-03 15:04 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-08-03 15:32 ` Arnd Hannemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41b516cb0608040816o63ac2f72q20add7619734906@mail.gmail.com \
--to=chris.leech@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndnet.de \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olel@ans.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®