From: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Ananthu C V <ananthu.cv@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Oleg Keri <okerixx@gmail.com>,
zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: fix policy max not returning to non-boost freq on boost disable
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 22:17:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41f328b2-0825-4023-b86c-48136ba6ecd2@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929-schedutil-boost-frequency-handling-v3-2-68de169498c7@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 9/29/2026 7:38 PM, Ananthu C V wrote:
> Commit 538b0188da46 ("cpufreq: ACPI: Set cpuinfo.max_freq directly if
> max boost is known") introduced a guard for cpuinfo max updates to only
> increase, to preserve driver-set values above the freq table maximum.
I think as discussed in v2 the changelog should describe the impact of
commit 6e39ba4e5a82 ("cpufreq: Add boost_freq_req QoS request"), since
it is relevant to understanding this fix.
> Later commit db80ad776cd2 ("cpufreq: Remove driver default policy->min/max
> init") dropped the 'policy->max = max_freq' assignment from
> cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo, leaving that one-way-guard to be the only
> path for cpuinfo max and consequently policy max to be updated, causing
> both values to be stuck at boost frequency even when boost is disabled.
>
> Unconditionally track the highest non-boost frequency (max_base_freq)
> in the freq table. If boost frequencies are available, use the highest
> frequency from the table/max_base_freq instead of cpuinfo->max_freq to
> control boost values, so the value can decrease again when boost is
> disabled.
>
> Fixes: db80ad776cd2 ("cpufreq: Remove driver default policy->min/max init")
Patch 2/2 currently depends on a helper introduced by patch 1/2, which
prevents it from being backported independently. Since 2/2 is an
independent fix that should be backported to stable on its own, I think
it should be placed before patch 1/2 in the series and kept self
contained.
> Signed-off-by: Ananthu C V <ananthu.cv@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 9 ++++++++-
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 96515880b4ac..5e6afb6f8826 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -574,6 +574,8 @@ static ssize_t show_local_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
>
> static int policy_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool enable)
> {
> + unsigned int max_freq;
> + unsigned int max_table_freq;
> int ret;
>
> if (policy->boost_enabled == enable)
> @@ -587,7 +589,19 @@ static int policy_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool enable)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ret = freq_qos_update_request(&policy->boost_freq_req, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> + max_table_freq = cpufreq_frequency_table_max(policy);
> +
> + if (policy_has_boost_freq(policy)) {
> + max_freq = enable ? max_table_freq : policy->cpuinfo.max_base_freq;
> +
> + if (!max_freq)
> + /* when the freq table contains only boost frequencies */
> + max_freq = max_table_freq;
> + } else {
> + max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> + }
> +
> + ret = freq_qos_update_request(&policy->boost_freq_req, max_freq);
> if (ret < 0) {
> policy->boost_enabled = !policy->boost_enabled;
> cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, policy->boost_enabled);
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
> index ea994647abc8..820ed4559f6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> * FREQUENCY TABLE HELPERS *
> *********************************************************************/
>
> -static bool policy_has_boost_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +bool policy_has_boost_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *table = policy->freq_table;
>
> @@ -27,17 +27,22 @@ static bool policy_has_boost_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> return false;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(policy_has_boost_freq);
>
> int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *table = policy->freq_table;
> unsigned int min_freq = ~0;
> unsigned int max_freq = 0;
> + unsigned int max_base_freq = 0;
> unsigned int freq, i;
>
> cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry_idx(pos, table, i) {
> freq = pos->frequency;
>
> + if (!(pos->flags & CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ) && freq > max_base_freq)
> + max_base_freq = freq;
> +
> if ((!cpufreq_boost_enabled() || !policy->boost_enabled)
> && (pos->flags & CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ))
> continue;
> @@ -57,6 +62,8 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> if (policy->cpuinfo.max_freq < max_freq)
> policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = max_freq;
>
> + policy->cpuinfo.max_base_freq = max_base_freq;
> +
> if (min_freq == ~0)
> return -EINVAL;
> else
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index f048c925fd98..7bb58405e004 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ enum cpufreq_table_sorting {
> struct cpufreq_cpuinfo {
> unsigned int max_freq;
> unsigned int min_freq;
> + unsigned int max_base_freq; /* Highest non-boost frequency in the table */
To avoid introducing a new member that is only used by frequency-table
drivers, please consider the following implementation instead:
If there are boost entries in the frequency table, the table is the only
source of cpuinfo.max_freq, so let cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() set
it unconditionally in that case.
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
index ea99464..8c8bad2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
@@ -33,14 +33,17 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct
cpufreq_policy *policy)
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *table = policy->freq_table;
unsigned int min_freq = ~0;
unsigned int max_freq = 0;
+ bool has_boost = false;
unsigned int freq, i;
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry_idx(pos, table, i) {
freq = pos->frequency;
- if ((!cpufreq_boost_enabled() || !policy->boost_enabled)
- && (pos->flags & CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ))
- continue;
+ if (pos->flags & CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ) {
+ has_boost = true;
+ if (!cpufreq_boost_enabled() || !policy->boost_enabled)
+ continue;
+ }
pr_debug("table entry %u: %u kHz\n", i, freq);
if (freq < min_freq)
@@ -50,17 +53,20 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct
cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = min_freq;
+
+ if (min_freq == ~0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/*
* If the driver has set its own cpuinfo.max_freq above max_freq, leave
- * it as is.
+ * it as is. This does not apply to tables with boost entries, because
+ * the table is the only source of cpuinfo.max_freq then and it needs
+ * to go down again when boost is disabled.
*/
- if (policy->cpuinfo.max_freq < max_freq)
+ if (has_boost || policy->cpuinfo.max_freq < max_freq)
policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = max_freq;
- if (min_freq == ~0)
- return -EINVAL;
- else
- return 0;
+ return 0;
}
int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy)
>
> /* in 10^(-9) s = nanoseconds */
> unsigned int transition_latency;
> @@ -791,6 +792,8 @@ struct cpufreq_frequency_table {
>
> int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
>
> +bool policy_has_boost_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
> +
> int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy);
>
> int cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy);
>
--
Thx and BRs,
Zhongqiu Han
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 11:38 [PATCH v3 0/2] sched/cpufreq: fix schedutil's boost frequency handling Ananthu C V
2026-09-29 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] arch_topology: seed capacity_freq_ref with highest available frequency Ananthu C V
2026-10-11 14:16 ` Zhongqiu Han
2026-10-12 18:45 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-29 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: fix policy max not returning to non-boost freq on boost disable Ananthu C V
2026-10-11 14:17 ` Zhongqiu Han [this message]
2026-10-11 23:42 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-30 9:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] sched/cpufreq: fix schedutil's boost frequency handling Oleg Keri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41f328b2-0825-4023-b86c-48136ba6ecd2@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ananthu.cv@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okerixx@gmail.com \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®