Hi,

Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 06:37:29PM +0100, matthieu castet wrote:
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 02:23:53PM +0100, matthieu castet wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>this patch add PNP support for the i8042 driver in 2.6.10-rc1-mm5. Acpi 
>>>>is try before the pnp driver so if you don't disable ACPI or apply 
>>>>others pnpacpi patches, it won't change anything.
>>>>
>>>>Please review it and apply if possible
>>>
>>>
>>>Ok, my thoughts on this:
>>>
>>>	It's OK to keep the device allocated to this driver via the PnP
>>>       subsystem, and not bother with releasing the code via
>>>	__initcall.
>>>
>>>	I agree that if there is a way to enumerate the device, (like
>>>	PnP, ACPI or OpenFirmware), we should use that instead of
>>>	probing and using a platform device for the controller.
>>>
>>>	I think that we should drop the ACPI support from i8042, in
>>>	favor of pnpacpi, because PnP is more generic and if the
>>>	keyboard device was listed in PnPBIOS instead of ACPI, it'll
>>>	still work.
>>>
>>
>>Any news about this ?
> 
>  
> Sort of fell off my radar, can you resend?
> 
attached 2 versions : the one that kill acpi detection and the one with 
acpi but a complex init.


Matthieu