From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261352AbVBGFEq (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 00:04:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261353AbVBGFEq (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 00:04:46 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.204]:42593 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261352AbVBGFEb (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 00:04:31 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pXxQoqU3MWqUfm1lAg2SnZgTl/Z5J9oEX30iBP2qVzXSdJEsjUGWiQD6iOkKbO2Y+Wtqf9ikXLXotORYvyvCyS1CE1gKjcJckwryKrjj1XeOw4HKf095MFLHrooAEIoS7fH7H11erfXOn6nhzs2VhqFseM5PoJTTRs4Hm5kZcmw= Message-ID: <4206F6D9.6050700@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:04:25 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050118) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2 05/09] ide: map ide_task_ioctl() to ide_taskfile_ioctl() References: <20050205021502.GA17767@htj.dyndns.org> <20050205021556.CFCE41326F9@htj.dyndns.org> <58cb370e050206103817d11145@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <58cb370e050206103817d11145@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 11:15:56 +0900 (KST), Tejun Heo wrote: > > >>- int err = 0; >>- u8 args[7], *argbuf = args; >>- int argsize = 7; >>+ u8 args[7]; >>+ ide_task_t task; >>+ task_ioreg_t *regs = task.tfRegister; > > > u8 *regs please > Sure. > >>+ int ret; > > > What is the reason for changing the name of variable > (other than making the patch bigger ;) ? Heh, Heh, I thought I could get away with it. I'll restore it. :-) > Please also read comments to patch #4. Thanks. -- tejun