Re: [PATCH Resend 7/8] tools/power x86_energy_perf_policy: rename some perf output strings for AMD processors

[Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>]

On 1/29/2024 23:56, Perry Yuan wrote:
> rename some perf strings using same definition for AMD CPPC performance
> capabilities.

I'm not sure I get why these need to deviate.  The nomenclature is 
clearer for everyone this way isn't it?  So why not just make the same 
change for everyone (IE min->lowest, max->highest, des->desired)?

> 
> cpu0: [AMD HWP_REQ]: lowest 12 highest 166 desired 0 epp 128 window
> 0x131497d0 (80*10^7us) use_pkg 89
> 
> cpu1: [AMD HWP_REQ]: lowest 12 highest 166 desired 0 epp 128 window
> 0x131497d0 (80*10^7us) use_pkg 89
> 
> Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
> ---
>   .../x86_energy_perf_policy.c                  | 23 ++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/power/x86/x86_energy_perf_policy/x86_energy_perf_policy.c b/tools/power/x86/x86_energy_perf_policy/x86_energy_perf_policy.c
> index ada1aaabad8c..845cfedab06e 100644
> --- a/tools/power/x86/x86_energy_perf_policy/x86_energy_perf_policy.c
> +++ b/tools/power/x86/x86_energy_perf_policy/x86_energy_perf_policy.c
> @@ -864,10 +864,15 @@ void print_hwp_request(int cpu, struct msr_hwp_request *h, char *str)
>   
>   	if (str)
>   		printf("%s", str);
> +	if (genuine_intel)
> +		printf("HWP_REQ: min %d max %d des %d epp %d window 0x%x (%d*10^%dus) use_pkg %d\n",
> +			h->hwp_min, h->hwp_max, h->hwp_desired, h->hwp_epp,
> +			h->hwp_window, h->hwp_window & 0x7F, (h->hwp_window >> 7) & 0x7, h->hwp_use_pkg);
> +	else if (authentic_amd)
> +		printf("[AMD HWP_REQ]: lowest %d highest %d desired %d epp %d window 0x%x (%d*10^%dus) use_pkg %d\n",
> +			h->hwp_min, h->hwp_max, h->hwp_desired, h->hwp_epp,
> +			h->hwp_window, h->hwp_window & 0x7F, (h->hwp_window >> 7) & 0x7, h->hwp_use_pkg);
>   
> -	printf("HWP_REQ: min %d max %d des %d epp %d window 0x%x (%d*10^%dus) use_pkg %d\n",
> -		h->hwp_min, h->hwp_max, h->hwp_desired, h->hwp_epp,
> -		h->hwp_window, h->hwp_window & 0x7F, (h->hwp_window >> 7) & 0x7, h->hwp_use_pkg);
>   }
>   void print_hwp_request_pkg(int pkg, struct msr_hwp_request *h, char *str)
>   {
> @@ -876,9 +881,15 @@ void print_hwp_request_pkg(int pkg, struct msr_hwp_request *h, char *str)
>   	if (str)
>   		printf("%s", str);
>   
> -	printf("HWP_REQ_PKG: min %d max %d des %d epp %d window 0x%x (%d*10^%dus)\n",
> -		h->hwp_min, h->hwp_max, h->hwp_desired, h->hwp_epp,
> -		h->hwp_window, h->hwp_window & 0x7F, (h->hwp_window >> 7) & 0x7);
> +	if (genuine_intel) {
> +		printf("HWP_REQ_PKG: min %d max %d des %d epp %d window 0x%x (%d*10^%dus)\n",
> +			h->hwp_min, h->hwp_max, h->hwp_desired, h->hwp_epp,
> +			h->hwp_window, h->hwp_window & 0x7F, (h->hwp_window >> 7) & 0x7);
> +	} else if (authentic_amd) {
> +		printf("AMD HWP_REQ_PKG: lowest %d highest %d desired %d epp %d window 0x%x (%d*10^%dus)\n",
> +			h->hwp_min, h->hwp_max, h->hwp_desired, h->hwp_epp,
> +			h->hwp_window, h->hwp_window & 0x7F, (h->hwp_window >> 7) & 0x7);
> +	}
>   }
>   void read_hwp_request(int cpu, struct msr_hwp_request *hwp_req, unsigned int msr_offset)
>   {