From: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>
To: Terence Ripperda <tripperda@nvidia.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit pci bar on a 32-bit kernel
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:34:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421E5674.5000901@didntduck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050224202218.GK4801@hygelac>
Terence Ripperda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we've gotten a customer report of a problem whereby our framebuffer is
> not visible through the kernel. the kernel data structures in struct
> pci_dev have bar1 (our framebuffer) set to 0, and the bar does not
> appear in /proc/pci.
>
> after a little investigation, it appears that the bios allocated a
> 64-bit bar in pci config space. our gpu claims 64-bit support in pci
> config space and the cpu is an em64t. but the customer is running a
> 32-bit kernel on the em64t, which is a reasonable thing to do. it
> turns out the pci driver does not like 64-bit bars on a 32-bit kernel
> and prints out the following messages during boot:
>
> PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xf0031, last bus=5
> PCI: Using configuration type 1
> PCI: Probing PCI hardware
> PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00)
> PCI: Ignoring BAR0-3 of IDE controller 00:1f.1
> PCI: Unable to handle 64-bit address space for
> PCI: Unable to handle 64-bit address space for
> PCI: Unable to handle 64-bit address for device 03:00.0
> PCI: Unable to handle 64-bit address space for
>
> Is this an expected problem? Is there any reason why the 32-bit kernel
> couldn't handle 64-bit bars?
>
> here's what pci config space for our gpu looks like:
>
> 00: de 10 ce 00 07 01 10 00 a2 00 00 03 10 00 00 00
> 10: 00 00 00 de 0c 00 00 f8 0f 00 00 00 04 00 00 dd
> 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 de 10 43 02
> 30: 00 00 ee df 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0a 01 00 00
>
> Thanks,
> Terence
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
It looks like support for 64-bit struct resouce is being worked on in
the -mm tree.
--
Brian Gerst
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-24 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-24 20:22 Terence Ripperda
2005-02-24 21:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-24 22:34 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=421E5674.5000901@didntduck.org \
--to=bgerst@didntduck.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tripperda@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®