From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@iokpp.de>
To: "Zailiang Zhang (zaizhang)" <zaizhang@cisco.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
"pratyush@kernel.org" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
"mwalle@kernel.org" <mwalle@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: micron-st: fix FSR read fallback for controllers returning -ENOTSUPP
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 18:17:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4223576d9f55b2a3ae18cf148765a1a5487367df.camel@iokpp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DS0PR11MB8668FC8E62236D0893A8CEFFC84EA@DS0PR11MB8668.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, 2026-03-18 at 17:04 +0000, Zailiang Zhang (zaizhang) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our platform is using Intel Raptorlake CPU, so it’s not our own spi master
> driver.
> The kernel version we are using is 6.6.21.
> I think when micron read fsr function calls spi_mem_exec_op(), it has
> following return:
> > if (!spi_mem_internal_supports_op(mem, op))
> > return -ENOTSUPP;
> Please correct me if I am wrong here. Also the latest upstream kernel may not
> use the same handling code.
Hi Zailiang,
You are correct. the commit cff49d58f57e ("spi: Unify error codes by replacing -
ENOTSUPP with -EOPNOTSUPP"), merged upstream on November 29, 2023, which changed
spi_mem_exec_op() to return -EOPNOTSUPP instead of -ENOTSUPP when an operation
is not supported. Kernel 6.6.21 predates this fix, which is why you see -NOTSUPP
on your platform with Intel Raptor Lake.
Hi Tudor,
This changes the picture. The -ENOTSUPP Zailiang observed is coming directly
from spi_mem_exec_op() in kernel 6.6.21, before commit cff49d58f57e was in
place. That commit fixed the SPI mem framework itself, but it may not have been
backported to all stable trees.
I would therefore argue that our micron-st.c fix is still worth keeping for the
the reason that it provides a safety net for stable kernels that did not receive
cff49d58f57e as a backport.
That said, I am happy to follow your guidance on how to proceed.
Kind regards,
Bean
>
> Please decide the fixup accordingly.
>
> Thanks,
> Zailiang
>
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@iokpp.de>
> Date: Wednesday, March 18, 2026 at 6:45 AM
> To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>, pratyush@kernel.org
> <pratyush@kernel.org>, mwalle@kernel.org <mwalle@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Zailiang Zhang
> (zaizhang) <zaizhang@cisco.com>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: micron-st: fix FSR read fallback for
> controllers returning -ENOTSUPP
>
> On Wed, 2026-03-18 at 15:26 +0200, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> > Hi, Bean!
> >
> > On 3/18/26 3:18 PM, Bean Huo wrote:
> > > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> > >
> > > micron_st_nor_ready() falls back to SR-only polling when the SPI
> > > controller does not support low-level FSR reads, but only checks for
> > > -EOPNOTSUPP (95). Some SPI master drivers return the kernel-internal
> > > -ENOTSUPP (524) for the same condition. The two codes carry identical
> >
> > Isn't it a better fix to update the spi controllers to use EOPNOTSUPP?
>
>
> Hi Zailiang Zhang,
>
> Can you forward this to your colleagues and check if the SPI master driver can
> be fixed to return -EOPNOTSUPP instead of -ENOTSUPP?
>
>
> Hi Tudor,
>
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
>
> You are right that fixing the spi controller to return -EOPNOTSUPP is the
> ideal
> solution, and I have reached out to the reporter to investigate on their end.
>
>
> However, I would suggest keeping this fix in micron-st.c for the following
> reasons:
>
> 1, The offending SPI master driver appears to be out-of-tree/downstream, so we
> cannot guarantee an upstream fix will reach all affected platforms.
> 2, spi-mem.c already treats both -ENOTSUPP and -EOPNOTSUPP as equivalent in
> spi_mem_exec_op() so this one-liner aligns micron_st_nor_ready() with the
> convention already established in the SPI mem framework.
> 3, there may be other SPI controllers in the field with the same behavior that
> we are not aware of. A defensive fix here costs nothing and prevents future
> reports.
>
> I am happy to drop this patch if you feel strongly that the fix belongs only
> in
> the controller driver and the reporter confirms they can fix it on their spi
> nor
> master driver.
>
> Kind regards,
> Bean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-18 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-18 13:18 Bean Huo
2026-03-18 13:26 ` Tudor Ambarus
2026-03-18 13:44 ` Bean Huo
[not found] ` <DS0PR11MB8668FC8E62236D0893A8CEFFC84EA@DS0PR11MB8668.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2026-03-18 17:17 ` Bean Huo [this message]
2026-03-19 9:10 ` Tudor Ambarus
2026-03-19 11:19 ` Pratyush Yadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4223576d9f55b2a3ae18cf148765a1a5487367df.camel@iokpp.de \
--to=beanhuo@iokpp.de \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
--cc=zaizhang@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®