mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bruce <bruce@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>, Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Potentially dead bttv cards from 2.6.10
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:44:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42248DE0.9090003@andrew.cmu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42247822.7030107@grupopie.com>

Sorry, I wasn't clear in the previous email; I did try the card= option 
anyway.  I wrote a looping script and tested first 70 card= options, and 
none worked properly for streaming capture.  Some did show different 
behavior though.  I might try the remaining 50 later today.

I did notice one strange thing though; the card= option is only applied 
to the first bttv card.  All remaining cards in the system are still 
autodetected (which ends up assuming card=0 in my case).  Not sure if 
this is the intended behavior or not, since someone really could run two 
different bttv cards in the same system.

  - Jim Bruce

Paulo Marques wrote:
> James Bruce wrote:
> 
>> [...]
>> The card= option didn't help in my case since my card is not in the 
>> list; For thess cards we went off the reccomendation of other people 
>> doing machine vision in Linux; Next time I guess we'll go name brand 
>> again...
> 
> 
> I think you should try it anyway, using all the options, because it is 
> very likely that your card might be compatible with one of the listed 
> ones. This is specially true if you don't care about the tuner.
> 
> Just modprobe the bttv module with card=X option, test it, rmmod it, 
> modprobe it again with card=X+1, etc., until you find a number that fits.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-01 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-26  4:57 James Bruce
2005-02-28 13:44 ` Gerd Knorr
2005-02-28 14:43   ` James Bruce
2005-02-28 16:02     ` Gerd Knorr
2005-02-28 16:45       ` Folkert van Heusden
2005-02-28 16:52         ` Gerd Knorr
2005-03-01  6:41       ` James Bruce
2005-03-01  8:44         ` Gerd Knorr
2005-03-01 13:10           ` James Bruce
2005-03-04 20:37           ` James Bruce
2005-02-28 23:14     ` Bill Davidsen
2005-03-01  7:06       ` James Bruce
2005-03-01 14:11         ` Paulo Marques
2005-03-01 15:44           ` James Bruce [this message]
2005-03-01 16:03             ` Gerd Knorr
2005-03-01 20:32             ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42248DE0.9090003@andrew.cmu.edu \
    --to=bruce@andrew.cmu.edu \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®