From: James Bruce <bruce@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>, Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Potentially dead bttv cards from 2.6.10
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:44:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42248DE0.9090003@andrew.cmu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42247822.7030107@grupopie.com>
Sorry, I wasn't clear in the previous email; I did try the card= option
anyway. I wrote a looping script and tested first 70 card= options, and
none worked properly for streaming capture. Some did show different
behavior though. I might try the remaining 50 later today.
I did notice one strange thing though; the card= option is only applied
to the first bttv card. All remaining cards in the system are still
autodetected (which ends up assuming card=0 in my case). Not sure if
this is the intended behavior or not, since someone really could run two
different bttv cards in the same system.
- Jim Bruce
Paulo Marques wrote:
> James Bruce wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> The card= option didn't help in my case since my card is not in the
>> list; For thess cards we went off the reccomendation of other people
>> doing machine vision in Linux; Next time I guess we'll go name brand
>> again...
>
>
> I think you should try it anyway, using all the options, because it is
> very likely that your card might be compatible with one of the listed
> ones. This is specially true if you don't care about the tuner.
>
> Just modprobe the bttv module with card=X option, test it, rmmod it,
> modprobe it again with card=X+1, etc., until you find a number that fits.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-01 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-26 4:57 James Bruce
2005-02-28 13:44 ` Gerd Knorr
2005-02-28 14:43 ` James Bruce
2005-02-28 16:02 ` Gerd Knorr
2005-02-28 16:45 ` Folkert van Heusden
2005-02-28 16:52 ` Gerd Knorr
2005-03-01 6:41 ` James Bruce
2005-03-01 8:44 ` Gerd Knorr
2005-03-01 13:10 ` James Bruce
2005-03-04 20:37 ` James Bruce
2005-02-28 23:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-03-01 7:06 ` James Bruce
2005-03-01 14:11 ` Paulo Marques
2005-03-01 15:44 ` James Bruce [this message]
2005-03-01 16:03 ` Gerd Knorr
2005-03-01 20:32 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42248DE0.9090003@andrew.cmu.edu \
--to=bruce@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®