From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752070AbaEFSWA (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2014 14:22:00 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:56746 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750859AbaEFSV6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2014 14:21:58 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Joerg Roedel , Shaik Ameer Basha , Linux DeviceTree , Linux Samsung SOC , Shaik Ameer Basha , Prathyush , Grant Grundler , Tomasz Figa , "supash.ramaswamy" , Linux Kernel , Cho KyongHo , Tomasz Figa , Sachin Kamat , Linux IOMMU , Kukjin Kim , Sylwester Nawrocki , Antonios Motakis , Varun Sethi , sunil joshi , Rahul Sharma Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/31] iommu/exynos: Fixes and Enhancements of System MMU driver with DT Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 20:21:48 +0200 Message-ID: <4231522.iA1YhEv1iL@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.11.0-18-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20140506175904.GB12376@8bytes.org> References: <1398584283-22846-1-git-send-email-shaik.ameer@samsung.com> <20140506175904.GB12376@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:QbEYaB0RjynEi5GHTDUYyZ6rR2S00aL8nKjdl53P5uT +gR5vPn5QKjB0uVdENm3xe2j2pyHI1VTOVceCoicrnRZd48ruK WrCWACRvm/4C3UyaqUwAz0Rmi+EdyQJRa/vVy0eJXQitYzj6V5 TOOBHGoWiIZKjbGAR9yqwPdh3DVp+UbYfdy33PA8gOKxjZVTZe 1Cgzc5o/ljxhYGwHg6PbHN95cC1b946hHuiiGQTlI4zt2JgEpf ftpP6fnlAvo+J1BUaEbDbOlnPineuvB5jU7qUy+Rd8D62/G2tL vGI4WphS3tCA6Um4skYj/hMWAOxXAQyJtqIvoeRsq+Edll8foH I9+vnSty5RwFQMwo8xrU= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 06 May 2014 19:59:05 Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:27:10PM +0530, Shaik Ameer Basha wrote: > > This series is going on for quite a long time and most of the patches here > > doesn't depend on dt bindings. As Exynos IOMMU h/w is introducing new versions > > very frequently, maintaining and reviewing all these patches again and > > again is quite a hard job. > > > > If it is acceptable, I can post one more series with the subset of > > above patches, > > which doesn't depend on dt-bindings. As all the patches which doesn't depend on > > DT bindings are already tested, I hope merging these subset of patches may help > > in reducing the rework and review effort every time. > > > > Once we finalize the generic DT bindings for the IOMMU devices, the driver > > can be updated with the proposed DT bindings in mind. > > Sounds reasonable to me if the patch subset is self-contained. When > Arnd is OK with that and no one else has objections I can take the > dt-independend parts. Sounds good to me. Arnd