mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: gene.heskett@verizon.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux and Kernel Video <video4linux-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: tvtime audio vs pcHDTV-3000 card and pvHDTV-1.6 software
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:44:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4238E0EA.8040101@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200503162015.37331.gene.heskett@verizon.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2782 bytes --]

Heavens, no need to clean the tree at all.  Just add "-X <file> to your diff.  I 
have attached what I use for <file>.  It is likely over kill, but should do...

-g

Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings;
> 
> I've spent a goodly part of the last 3 hours rebooting, to find out 
> where this audio control function died, and I think now I can point 
> an accusatory finger at the 2.6.11.2 patch with some degree of 
> certainty.
> 
> The scenario goes like this:
> 
> reboot to 2.6.11-rc5, everything works flawlessly except the 1394 
> stuff, that kernel didn't have it built in yet.
> 
> reboot to 2.6.11+bk-ieee1394.patch  everything works flawlessly
> 
> reboot to 2.6.11.1+bk-ieee1394.patch everything works flawlessly
> 
> reboot to 2.6.11.2+bk-ieee1394.patch tvtime has no volume control, and 
> the sound gets very very tinny about 1 second after it starts
> 
> This scenario continues up to and includeing 2.6.11.4.
> 
> So now my next question is, how to I clean up those src trees so that 
> a diff actually outputs only the src code differences, thereby 
> allowing a simple diff -urN (or whatever is the recommended command 
> line to do a recursive diff on the whole maryann) to disclose the 
> real diffs.  In other words, is a simple 'make clean' sufficient?
> 
> I got the impression from a comment that was made, that quite a body 
> of work was actually done, in the i2c area, that somehow does not 
> show in the changelog, nor in that simple little 10 line patch that 
> was 2.6.11.2.  And how that little patch could be responsible for 
> breaking this boggles what tiny little miniscule piece of a mind I 
> have left at this point.
> 
> If thats the case, then how did it get into my src code tree since the 
> exact same 2.6.11.tar.gz was used as the base for applying each of 
> the incrementals to each of the src trees I now have sitting 
> in /usr/src?  Good question that...
> 
> Unforch, the 2.6.11 plain tree has not, in this case been built yet as 
> it got accidently nuked by a missfire of my 'buildit26' script, which 
> normally moves a base version tree out of the way before it unpacks a 
> fresh copy, and then renames that tree to be the current version and 
> then restores the base tree to its original name.
> 
> Thats not the one I want to use as the 'gold standard' anyway. 
> 2.6.11.1 works, and 2.6.11.2 doesn't.  So at this point, 2.6.11.1 is 
> the 'gold standard'.
> 
> But, both the 2.6.11.1 and the 2.6.11.2 trees are as built, and the
> diff I got was far larger than forgetting to apply the 
> bk-ieee1394.patch to one of them would account for.  Many tens of 
> kilobytes in fact.
> 
> Please throw me a bone here folks.
> 

-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/

[-- Attachment #2: patch.exclude --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 532 bytes --]

*.o
*.i
.*
*.*~
*~
*.rej
*.orig
*.orig.*
#*
*#
*.ver
ETAGS
TAGS
tags
*.map
*.s
*.a
*X
*Y

*.*X
*.*Y
SCCS
CVS
*.*,*
dwarf2-defs.h
kconfig
configs.c
defconfig
mkdep
split-include
tkparse
vmlinux
consolemap_deftbl.c
tkparse.c
classlist.h
crc32table.h
devlist.h
config
autoconf.h
compile.h
version.h
kconfig.tk
soundmodem
defkeymap.c
patest
asm
boot
conmakehash
gen-devlist
modversions.h
elfconfig.h
asm_offsets.h
*.old
cscope.*
*.so
gen_crc32table
docproc
fixdep
kallsyms
mk_elfconfig
modpost
pnmtologo
initramfs_data.*
gen_init_cpio


  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-17  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-17  1:15 Gene Heskett
2005-03-17  1:44 ` George Anzinger [this message]
2005-03-17  5:27 ` Success! was " Gene Heskett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4238E0EA.8040101@mvista.com \
    --to=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome