From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27502C4321E for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 14:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232531AbiK1OcJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:32:09 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53380 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232506AbiK1OcE (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:32:04 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01AAB1F2F1 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 06:32:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id z17so5833425pff.1 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 06:32:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aYzQA5+XofzkuI/jHdZUL6p8mJBbUYeRoj7O8Rf5OpI=; b=SW4xPqZEK4MUHUqPivuzG4pYf1aILgJDS/FfdSMbxx8hh+aidc5OMRnzM2GlgujG01 dqDKMsPmdg06eDdTWDlTS+viqebr+pGplFJ6HJFgRPV2TQUVfWUr8EWyDLuHVwN8gS1r y6ESoff3yDBcoCMGUBK7GFbjoyqiyOg2dUQ5HHQEJnNPn9JHOzImnLywRUtNgGRrDWOG ZJc+qdeH+eQFlwSWVkHM+cwnOQErS33YBUL2LXrCbXA1Mp1gu/+SDel3dFBKzUqCEZnZ juV+JAPSToX5YcUNaIFkPVWGSbBqBrn/F6RkecRfCUY/PZrrBHY5FFwuItPyq2ZlSHdF WvMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aYzQA5+XofzkuI/jHdZUL6p8mJBbUYeRoj7O8Rf5OpI=; b=HZ7YOw0k7ijt+T3Elc2bhG82sderdANk6NSI4izm4eOOk/jLp3gGg3ibajRXr0GQSM m/WZu/E98oioo+7he0XwZ4odG5tV/z7PdMyr7WLuxHJ6g123YJ7Bcqoroy8ofVdn/sdj R9yOPpUEmpxzX0rUW9x1R/esyPvYOZ5wCuf8xj8mFhpZ2LJN+av+7M6GZUzK27VHvZ4R nu35jTVAujgk065QDtufx16nfEJLRcTEWwK2hONkPu4zGsJ6jpGNhrIZdq2BbJ5b5fwV Qh4sdXJZ9GlAAk05DcNPjz+e46JUOw+qCmGkw6wnrDmkBYz/dsYvAKJzp5naN02MP7Tq E1qw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pl0Q8T22NDP9MJZUkD+GCh3oJrpGP7I4LwP2tYMpwIo2qml4oGB M8EE+4rMQl209AroPGEuH8cNBw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6e1tNCWXVdCniu5KAWoFanIymr34Pr667CIm+FDXDRMjvGr0iio1kf0DVBIwCtvuQd0RLTRg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:b54:0:b0:434:911a:301 with SMTP id a20-20020a630b54000000b00434911a0301mr29021976pgl.50.1669645922460; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 06:32:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.136] ([198.8.77.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b10-20020a62a10a000000b005742ee3bf71sm8059568pff.20.2022.11.28.06.32.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 06:32:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <423e090a-ac77-ad7e-dfb9-dcbd189e5141@kernel.dk> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 07:32:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/8] block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis Content-Language: en-US To: Paolo Valente , Damien Le Moal Cc: linux-block , linux-kernel , Arie van der Hoeven , Rory Chen , Gabriele Felici , Carmine Zaccagnino References: <20221103162623.10286-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> <20221103162623.10286-2-paolo.valente@linaro.org> <14cea0aa-2f0b-117a-4568-c80ca0513eec@opensource.wdc.com> <88084DDA-A705-4CFA-887E-021FC5DD89E9@linaro.org> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <88084DDA-A705-4CFA-887E-021FC5DD89E9@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/26/22 9:28?AM, Paolo Valente wrote: [snip walls of quoted, useless text[ Guys, can you please both start properly quoting emails? Leave the bit in place you are responding too, cut the rest. It's almost impossible to find the signal in all of that noise. This isn't an isolated incident, which is why I'm bringing it up. The context is there in previous emails should anyone need it. Not cutting any of the text when replying is just lazy and puts the onus on the reader on digging through the haystack to find the needle. -- Jens Axboe