mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix double free in create_space_info() error path
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 19:38:14 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4259c965-af46-4fb6-b7b6-514e11f34bc8@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANUHTR_ZgLHj8COyE8S_J+nqUUunxMTH9TcOMsDuN=Y1hPXPEg@mail.gmail.com>


> 
> So the call chain I had in mind is:
> 
> `create_space_info()`
> -> `btrfs_sysfs_add_space_info_type()`
> -> `kobject_init_and_add()`
> -> failure
> -> `kobject_put(&space_info->kobj)`
> -> `space_info_release()`
> -> `kfree(space_info)`
> 
> and then control returns to `create_space_info()`:
> 
> `btrfs_sysfs_add_space_info_type()` returns error
> -> `goto out_free`
> -> `kfree(space_info)`

Please add those two parts into the changelog.

Otherwise the current one fix is good to me, for this particular call site.

> 
> So my concern was that after `kobject_init_and_add()` has been called,
> the cleanup is already handed to `kobject_put()` /
> `space_info_release()`, and the later `kfree(space_info)` in
> `create_space_info()` becomes a second free.
> 
> If my understanding of the `kobject_init_and_add()` failure path here
> is incorrect, please let me know. I may be missing something.

Furthermore, there is a similar bug in create_space_info_sub_group() and 
all other locations.

Personally speaking, I do not like the idea of releasing the space_info 
through the callback at all.

It breaks the common scheme where who allocates the memory should free 
it, now we have different handling before and after 
kobject_init_and_add(), which is causing all kinds of problems.

But I'm afraid that's the way we have to go.

Thanks,
Qu

> 
> Thanks,
> Guangshuo
> 
> Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> 于2026年4月1日周三 12:34写道:
>>
>>
>>
>> 在 2026/4/1 13:43, Guangshuo Li 写道:
>>> When kobject_init_and_add() fails, btrfs_sysfs_add_space_info_type()
>>> calls kobject_put(&space_info->kobj).
>>>
>>> The kobject release callback space_info_release() frees space_info,
>>> but the current error path in create_space_info() then calls
>>> kfree(space_info) again, causing a double free.
>>
>> Can you give an example call chain of where such space_info_release() is
>> triggered?
>>
>>>
>>> Keep the direct kfree(space_info) for the earlier failure path, but
>>> after btrfs_sysfs_add_space_info_type() has called kobject_put(), let
>>> the kobject release callback handle the cleanup.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a11224a016d6d ("btrfs: fix memory leaks in create_space_info() error paths")
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>    fs/btrfs/space-info.c | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
>>> index 3f08e450f796..d7176eb2fcbf 100644
>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
>>> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static int create_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 flags)
>>>
>>>        ret = btrfs_sysfs_add_space_info_type(space_info);
>>>        if (ret)
>>> -             goto out_free;
>>> +             return ret;
>>>
>>>        list_add(&space_info->list, &info->space_info);
>>>        if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)
>>


      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-01  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-01  3:13 Guangshuo Li
2026-04-01  4:34 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-04-01  8:09   ` Guangshuo Li
2026-04-01  9:08     ` Qu Wenruo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4259c965-af46-4fb6-b7b6-514e11f34bc8@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®