mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Odin Ugedal <odin@ugedal.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
	Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] device_cgroup: Cleanup cgroup eBPF device filter code
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 22:30:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4264eb59-920e-20da-a256-23b6f0bbc95e@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200403223704.GA306670@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com>

On 4/4/20 12:37 AM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 07:55:28PM +0200, Odin Ugedal wrote:
>> Original cgroup v2 eBPF code for filtering device access made it
>> possible to compile with CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE=n and still use the eBPF
>> filtering. Change
>> commit 4b7d4d453fc4 ("device_cgroup: Export devcgroup_check_permission")
>> reverted this, making it required to set it to y.
>>
>> Since the device filtering (and all the docs) for cgroup v2 is no longer
>> a "device controller" like it was in v1, someone might compile their
>> kernel with CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE=n. Then (for linux 5.5+) the eBPF
>> filter will not be invoked, and all processes will be allowed access
>> to all devices, no matter what the eBPF filter says.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@ugedal.com>
> 
> The patch makes perfect sense to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>

Tejun, I presume you'll pick this up (given the files this fix touches)?

Thanks,
Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-06 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-03 17:55 Odin Ugedal
2020-04-03 18:05 ` Odin Ugedal
2020-04-03 22:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-04-06 20:30   ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2020-04-13 18:43 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4264eb59-920e-20da-a256-23b6f0bbc95e@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=odin@ugedal.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®